Golden v. Sound Inpatient Physicians Medical Group, Inc. et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/18/2015 GRANTING Stipulation for Extension of Time. Defendant Sound Inpatient Physicians Medical Group, Inc.'s time for filing a responsive pleading to the Third Amended Complaint is EXTENDED to 1/15/2016. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OTASHE GOLDEN, M.D., Plaintiffs, 12 13 v. 14 SOUND INPATIENT PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; DAMERON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a California Non-Profit Association; NICHOLAS ARISMENDI; an individual and DOES 1-10, inclusive. 15 16 17 Defendants. 18 Case No. 14-CV-00497-TLN-EFB Assigned to Honorable Judge: Troy L. Nunley ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SOUND INPATIENT PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC.’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE [Filed concurrently with Joint Stipulation] Complaint Filed: February 18, 2014 19 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CASE NO. 14-CV-00497-TLN-EFB 1 2 The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation Extending the Responsive Pleading Deadline, finds good cause to grant the request for extension and orders as follows: 3 Defendant SOUND INPATIENT PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC.’s 4 time for filing a responsive pleading to the Third Amended Complaint shall be extended to 5 January 15, 2016. 6 HEREBY ORDERED: 7 Dated: December 18, 2015 8 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 Respectfully submitted: 14 KUTAK ROCK LLP 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 By: /s/ Matthew C. Sgnilek Matthew C. Sgnilek (SBN 235299) Marcia A. Washkuhn, pro hac vice 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1500 Irvine, California 92614-8595 Telephone: (949) 417-0999 Facsimile: (949) 417-5394 Attorneys for Defendant SOUND INPATIENT PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CASE NO. 14-CV-00497-TLN-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?