Lambert v. Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc. et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/23/2015 ORDERING that the Court hereby lifts stay of this action in part to permit presentation of a motion for preliminary and final approval of a class settlement. The stay of this action shall otherwise remain in effect pending further order of the Court. Additionally, beginning on 4/20/2015 and pending further Order of the Court, the parties shall no longer be required to submit a Joint Status Report every 60 days, as initially required by this Court's Order dated 8/20/2014. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN #139386) michael.stortz@dbr.com MATTHEW J. ADLER (SBN #273147) matthew.adler@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 Attorneys for Defendant BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC. d/b/a THE BODY SHOP 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 AIMEE LAMBERT, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:14-cv-00514-MCE-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER TO LIFT STAY IN PART AND RELIEVE PARTIES OF OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE STATUS REPORTS BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC., a Delaware corporation; RAZE MEDIA, LLC, a Texas limited liability company; and DOES 1 – 50, inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRIN KER BIDDLE & R E A T H LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO LIFT STAY IN PART AND TO RELIEVE PARTIES OF OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE STATUS REPORTS CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00514-MCE-KJN 1 WHEREAS, on February 20, 2014, Plaintiff Aimee Lambert (“Plaintiff”) filed a 2 Complaint in this Court and asserted a single claim under the Telephone Consumer Protection 3 Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq., based upon allegations that Defendants Buth-Na- 4 Bodhaige, Inc. d/b/a The Body Shop (“TBS”) and Raze Media, LLC (“Raze”) sent marketing text 5 messages to Plaintiff and the putative class in alleged violation of the TCPA; 6 WHEREAS, on August 20, 2014, the Court entered an Order (D.E. 17) granting TBS’s 7 Motion to Dismiss or Stay (D.E. 10) and staying the action pending further order of the Court; 8 WHEREAS, the Order requires the parties to file a Joint Status Report every 60 days to 9 10 advise the Court as to the status of the petitions filed with the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) that were identified in TBS’ Request for Judicial Notice (D.E. 12); 11 12 WHEREAS, in accordance with the Order, the parties submitted a Joint Status Report on October 22, 2014 (D.E. 18), December 19, 2014 (D.E. 19), and February 17, 2015 (D.E. 20); 13 WHEREAS, a Joint Status Report is due as of the date of this filing, April 20, 2015; 14 WHEREAS, in lieu of filing another Joint Status Report, the parties submit this 15 Stipulation and Order because Plaintiff and TBS have reached an agreement in principal as to the 16 material terms of a classwide settlement; 17 18 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and TBS reached this agreement during a mediation session on March 24, 2015 with the Honorable Fred K. Morrison (Ret.) of JAMS; 19 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and TBS expect to finalize the settlement by the end of April 2015, 20 and will file a Notice of Settlement under Local Rule 160 upon execution of a settlement 21 agreement; 22 WHEREAS, the parties respectfully believe, that in light of the anticipated class 23 settlement, they should be relieved of their obligation to submit a Joint Status Report every 60 24 days, beginning with their obligation to submit a Joint Status Report on April 20, 2015; 25 WHEREAS, the parties further believe that to facilitate a class settlement the stay of this 26 action should be lifted in part to permit Plaintiff to bring a motion for preliminary and final 27 approval of a class settlement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e). 28 /// DRIN KER BIDDLE & R E A T H LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO LIFT STAY IN PART AND TO RELIEVE PARTIES OF OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE STATUS REPORTS -1- CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00514-MCE-KJN 1 2 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties through their respective counsel, as follows: 3 4 1. preliminary and final approval of a class settlement pursuant to Rule 23(e). 5 6 7 The stay of this action shall be lifted in part to permit presentation of a motion for 2. The stay of this action shall otherwise remain in effect pending further order of the 3. Beginning on April 20, 2015 and pending further Order of the Court, the parties Court. 8 shall no longer be required to submit a Joint Status Report every 60 days, as initially required by 9 this Court’s Order dated August 20, 2014 (D.E. 17). 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRIN KER BIDDLE & R E A T H LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO LIFT STAY IN PART AND TO RELIEVE PARTIES OF OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE STATUS REPORTS -2- CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00514-MCE-KJN 1 Dated: April 20, 2015 HORNBERGER LAW CORPORATION 2 3 By: /s/ Nicholas W. Hornberger (authorized 4.20.2015) Nicholas W. Hornberger Nathan Verbiscar-Brown 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff AIMEE LAMBERT 6 7 8 Dated: April 20, 2015 TRAINOR FAIRBROOK 9 10 By: /s/ Kathleen E. Finnerty (authorized 4.20.2015) Kathleen E. Finnerty 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant RAZE MEDIA, LLC 13 14 15 Dated: April 20, 2015 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 16 By: /s/ Michael J. Stortz Michael J. Stortz Matthew J. Adler 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC. d/b/a THE BODY SHOP 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRIN KER BIDDLE & R E A T H LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO LIFT STAY IN PART AND TO RELIEVE PARTIES OF OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE STATUS REPORTS -3- CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00514-MCE-KJN 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the signed stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby lifts stay of this action in 3 part to permit presentation of a motion for preliminary and final approval of a class settlement 4 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e). The stay of this action shall otherwise remain 5 in effect pending further order of the Court. Additionally, beginning on April 20, 2015 and 6 pending further Order of the Court, the parties shall no longer be required to submit a Joint Status 7 Report every 60 days, as initially required by this Court’s Order dated August 20, 2014. 8 9 Dated: April 23, 2015 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRIN KER BIDDLE & R E A T H LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO LIFT STAY IN PART AND TO RELIEVE PARTIES OF OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE STATUS REPORTS -4- CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00514-MCE-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?