Lambert v. Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc. et al

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/13/2014 ORDERING the deadline to respond to the complaint is CONTINUED to and including 5/30/2014. (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN #139386)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW J. ADLER (SBN #273147)
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2235
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC. d/b/a
THE BODY SHOP

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

AIMEE LAMBERT, an individual, on
behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:14-cv-00514-MCE-KJN
FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT

v.
BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC., a
Delaware corporation; RAZE MEDIA,
LLC, a Texas limited liability company;
and DOES 1 – 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRIN KER BIDDLE &
R E A T H LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

FURTHER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00514-MCE-KJN

1
2

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Aimee Lambert (“Plaintiff”) filed the Complaint on February 20,
2014;

3

WHEREAS, the current responsive pleading deadlines for Defendants Raze Media, LLC

4

and Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc. are May 9, 2014 and May 12, 2014, respectively, pursuant to a prior

5

stipulation of the parties to extend Defendants’ responsive pleading deadlines by 28 days (D.E.

6

7);

7
8
9
10

WHEREAS, Defendants have reviewed Plaintiff’s allegations but require additional time
to complete their factual investigations and prepare their responses to the Complaint;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties may stipulate, subject to Court
approval, to an additional extension of the time to respond to the Complaint;

11

WHEREAS, a further extension will not impact any other deadlines in this action; and

12

WHEREAS, the parties through counsel have met and conferred and reached agreement to

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

continue Defendants’ current responsive pleading deadlines by approximately three more weeks.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties through their respective
counsel, subject to Court approval, as follows:
1.

The deadline for Defendant Raze Media, LLC to respond to the Complaint is

continued to and including May 30, 2014.
2.

The deadline for Defendant Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc. to respond to the Complaint is

continued to and including May 30, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

1

Dated: May 6, 2014

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

2
3

By:
Michael J. Stortz
Matthew J. Adler

4
5

Attorneys for Defendant
BUTH-NA-BODHAIGE, INC. d/b/a
THE BODY SHOP

6
7
8

Dated: May 6, 2014

FINNERTY LAW OFFICES, INC.

9
10

By:
Kathleen E. Finnerty

11

Attorneys for Defendant
RAZE MEDIA, LLC

12
13
14

Dated: May _____, 2014

HORNBERGER LAW CORPORATION

15
16

By:
Nicholas W. Hornberger
Nathan Verbiscar-Brown

17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiff
AIMEE LAMBERT

19
20
21
22

ORDER
Pursuant to the above Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 13, 2014

23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-