Pereira v. Swarthout
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/16/15 ORDERING that Petitioner's request to treat his original petition as his amended petition (ECF No. 22 ) is DENIED. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the filing of this order to file an amended petition. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the first 27 pages of the original petition (ECF No. 1 ) and a blank § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus form.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD JOSEPH PEREIRA,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-0530 KJM AC P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
GARY SWARTHOUT,
Respondent.
16
17
18
19
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel on an application for writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
On June 4, 2014, the court struck Grounds 1 through 3 and 5 through 9 from the petition
20
and granted petitioner’s request to stay the petition, which now contains only Ground 4. ECF No.
21
15. The stay was granted and the case administratively closed to allow petitioner to exhaust his
22
unexhausted claims in state court. Id. Petitioner was ordered to notify this court of any ruling
23
from the California Supreme Court exhausting his then unexhausted claims, within thirty days of
24
a ruling from that court. Id. Within that time he was also to request the stay be lifted and file an
25
amended petition. Id. On September 21, 2015, the court received and docketed a request for
26
status that suggested petitioner may have previously attempted to notify the court of the status of
27
his attempts to exhaust his claims in state court. ECF No. 17. Petitioner was directed to file a
28
status report advising the court of the status of his efforts to exhaust his state court remedies and
1
1
whether he was seeking to lift the stay. ECF No. 18. Petitioner then filed a notice in which he
2
advised that he had requested the stay be lifted over eight months ago. ECF No. 19.1 Petitioner’s
3
request to lift the stay was granted and the case re-opened, and petitioner was ordered to notify
4
the court whether he would be amending the petition to include any of the previously stricken
5
claims. ECF No. 20.
6
Petitioner has now responded to the order. Petitioner requests that the court consider the
7
original petition as the amended petition because he no longer has any of his legal paperwork,
8
including his original petition, to refer to in drafting an amended document. He states an
9
intention to revive all of his original claims. ECF No. 22. Petitioner’s request will be denied.
10
Instead, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to send petitioner a blank habeas petition form and
11
the first twenty-seven pages of the original petition. Petitioner may file an amended petition
12
which must include information regarding the exhaustion of the previously unexhausted claims as
13
requested on the petition form. Upon filing of an amended petition, the Clerk of the Court will be
14
directed to attach pages twenty-eight through one hundred sixty-three of the original petition as
15
exhibits to the amended petition.
16
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
17
1. Petitioner’s request to treat his original petition as his amended petition (ECF No. 22)
18
is denied.
19
2. Petitioner shall have thirty days from the filing of this order to file an amended
20
petition. The amended petition must include information regarding the exhaustion of the
21
previously unexhausted claims as requested on the petition form. If petitioner does not file an
22
amended petition, the case will proceed on Ground 4 of the original petition.
23
////
24
////
25
////
26
////
27
28
1
It does not appear that the court received that request.
2
1
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the first twenty-seven
2
pages of the original petition (ECF No. 1) and a blank § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus
3
form.
4
DATED: November 16, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?