Trujillo v. Hithe
Filing
74
ORDER adopting 73 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/27/16: Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 53) is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion for summary judgment on the same matter. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0584 JAM AC P
v.
ORDER
HITHE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil
17
18
rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On September 7, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 73. Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 7, 2016, are adopted in full;
27
28
////
1
1
2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 53) is denied without prejudice to the filing
2
of a motion for summary judgment on the same matter.
3
DATED: October 27, 2016
4
/s/ John A. Mendez_________________________
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?