Trujillo v. Hithe

Filing 82

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/30/17 ordering that the order filed 03/28/17 80 is vacated. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-0584 JAM AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

HITHE, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On March 9, 2017, defendant Hithe filed a motion to compel plaintiff’s responses to

18

defendant’s first set of interrogatories pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. ECF No.

19

79. On March 28, 2017, the court ordered plaintiff to respond to defendant’s motion within thirty

20

days from the date of the order. ECF No. 80. That same day, defendant Hithe filed a notice of

21

withdrawal of his motion to compel, noting that counsel for defendant received plaintiff’s

22

responses to the discovery requests on or about March 24, 2017. ECF No. 81. Thus, plaintiff

23

does not need to respond to defendant Hithe’s motion to compel. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

24

ORDERED that the order filed March 28, 2017 (ECF No. 80) is vacated.

25

DATED: March 30, 2017

26
27
28