Orr v. Brame, et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/29/15: Within fourteen days of this order, defendants and/or their attorneys shall reimburse plaintiff the costs incurred in reconvening the depositions of Brame and Plumb in the total amount of $1,624.05. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HARRISON ORR, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:14-cv-585-WBS-EFB v. ORDER CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, a public entity; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity; CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL OFFICERS BRAME and PLUMB, individually, and DOES 1 through 10, Individually, Defendants. 18 19 On November 14, 2014, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to compel further depositions 20 21 of defendants Brame and Plumb. ECF No. 49. The order also provided that defendants and/or 22 their attorneys shall pay the entire cost of the additional videotaped depositions. Id. at 2. On 23 January 21, 2015, plaintiff’s counsel, Genevieve Guertin, submitted a declaration providing that 24 the total costs of reconvening the depositions of defendants Brame and Plumb was $1,624.05. 25 ECF No. 60 ¶ 13. 26 Pursuant to the court’s November 14, 2014 order, ECF No. 49, and having considered the 27 declaration of Genevieve Guertin and the attachments thereto, ECF No. 60, within fourteen days 28 ///// 1 1 of this order, defendants and/or their attorneys shall reimburse plaintiff the costs incurred in 2 reconvening the depositions of Brame and Plumb in the total amount of $1,624.05. 3 So Ordered. 4 DATED: January 29, 2015. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?