Orr v. Brame, et al
Filing
75
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/9/2015 ORDERING that Exhibit 26 (ECF 54 -25) to the 54 Declaration of T. Kennedy Helm in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is sealed. Plaintiff to file a new Exhibit 26 to replace it that does not contain any material that Defendants consider confidential. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)
JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)
GENEVIEVE K. GUERTIN (State Bar No. 262479)
T. KENNEDY HELM (State Bar No. 282319)
HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP
505 Seventeenth Street
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 452-5500
Fax: (510) 452-5510
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HARRISON LUTHER ORR
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
HARRISON LUTHER ORR,
Individually,
Plaintiff,
vs.
15
16
17
18
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, a
public entity; STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
a public entity; CALIFORNIA
HIGHWAY PATROL OFFICERS
BRAME, PLUMB, and DOES 1-10,
individually,
19
20
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:14-cv-0585-WBS-EFB
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER REGARDING SEALING OR
LOCKING ECF 54-25
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2:14-cv-0585-WBS-EFB: STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SEAL/LOCK ECF 54-25.
1
The parties in this case, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate, and
2
request this Court to order, that Exhibit 26 (ECF 54-25) to the Declaration of T. Kennedy Helm in
3
Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF 54) be sealed or locked.
4
Plaintiff will replace the current Exhibit 26 with a new Exhibit 26 containing no confidential
5
material. This joint request is based on the following:
6
1. Defendants inadvertently did not clearly designate the material comprising Exhibit
7
26 (ECF 54-25) as confidential pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order (ECF
8
30) until after Plaintiff had filed it as an exhibit and Plaintiff did not give notice
9
beforehand to Defendants that it was filing ECF 54-25.
10
2. Defendant State of California, appearing by and through the Department of
11
California Highway Patrol (CHP), greys out sections of the Highway Patrol Manual
12
(HPM) to indicate material which it restricts from public disclosure because such
13
disclosure could jeopardize officer safety.
14
15
16
17
18
19
3. Plaintiff’s current Exhibit 26 (ECF 54-25) contains a substantial amount of greyedout text in HPM 70.6, Chapter 2.
4. Defendants are concerned that the material in Exhibit 26 (ECF 54-25) should not be
in the public domain for officer-safety reasons.
5. Plaintiff agrees to file a new Exhibit 26 which Defendants agree contains no
confidential material that requires it to be sealed.
20
21
SO STIPULATED.
22
Dated: January 28, 2015
HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP
23
24
25
26
/s/ T. Kennedy Helm
T. KENNEDY HELM
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HARRISON LUTHER ORR
27
28
2:14-cv-0585-WBS-EFB: STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SEAL/LOCK ECF 54-25
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: February 4, 2015
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
PETER A. MESHOT
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
/s/ Stephen C. Pass*
STEPHEN C. PASS
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPEARING BY AND
THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA
HIGHWAY PATROL, TERRY PLUMB AND JAY
BRAME
8
* Mr. Pass provided his consent that this document be electronically filed.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2:14-cv-0585-WBS-EFB: STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SEAL/LOCK ECF 54-25
2
1
2
ORDER
This Court orders that Exhibit 26 (ECF 54-25) to the Declaration of T. Kennedy Helm in
3
Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 54) be sealed. Plaintiff will file a new
4
Exhibit 26 to replace it that does not contain any material that Defendants consider confidential.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: February 9, 2015
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2:14-cv-0585-WBS-EFB: STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SEAL DOC. 54-25.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?