Jackson v. Austin et al
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/24/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's opposition to the motion to compel is due within 21 days of the date on which this order is filed; defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAWRENCE J. JACKSON, JR.,
12
No. 2:14-cv-0592 KJM KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
J. AUSTIN, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On May 6, 2015, defendant J. Austin filed a motion to compel responses to a
19
request for production of documents. (ECF No. 28.) Defendant Austin contends therein that
20
plaintiff failed entirely to respond to the discovery requests in question. Plaintiff has to date
21
failed to file an opposition to the motion to compel.
22
Plaintiff is directed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to
23
compel within 21 days from the date of this order. Failure to respond may be deemed a waiver of
24
any opposition to the granting of the motion. Local Rule 230(l). Moreover, plaintiff is cautioned
25
that he is required to cooperate in discovery. Failure to cooperate in discovery may result in the
26
imposition of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be
27
dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A) (sanctions may be imposed for failure to comply with
28
a discovery order); Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(d)(3) (sanctions may be imposed for failure to serve
1
1
answers to interrogatories or to respond to requests for production of documents).
2
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s opposition to the
3
motion to compel is due within 21 days of the date on which this order is filed; defendant’s reply,
4
if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to timely comply
5
with this order may result in the issuance of sanctions, including dismissal of this action.
6
Dated: June 24, 2015
7
8
9
/jack 0592.eot
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?