California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Jim Dobbas, Inc. et al

Filing 119

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/3/2015 GRANTING 117 Defendant Jim Dobbas' Request to Continue Motion Hearing : Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on 79 Defendant West Coast Wood Preserving, LLC's motion for summary judgment currently scheduled for 3/9/2015, be, and the same hereby is, CONTINUED to 4/6/2015, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 13 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL and the TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACCOUNT, CIV. NO. 2:14-595 WBS EFB ORDER Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. JIM DOBBAS, INC., a California corporation; CONTINENTAL RAIL, INC., a Delaware corporation; DAVID VAN OVER, individually; PACIFIC WOOD PRESERVING, a dissolved California corporation; and WEST COAST WOOD PRESERVING, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Defendants, AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSS-CLAIMS. ----oo0oo---Concurrently with its motion for summary judgment, defendant Jim Dobbas, Inc. filed a request to further continue 1 1 the hearing on WCWP’s motion so that the court may consider both 2 motions for summary judgment at the same time. 3 Plaintiffs have filed a notice of non-opposition to Dobbas’s 4 request pursuant to Local Rule 230(c). 5 (Docket No. 118.) (Docket No. 118.) Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 6 hearing on defendant West Coast Wood Preserving, LLC’s motion for 7 summary judgment currently scheduled for March 9, 2015, be, and 8 the same hereby is, CONTINUED to April 6, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. 9 Dated: March 3, 2015 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?