California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Jim Dobbas, Inc. et al

Filing 166

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 06/08/17 ORDERING that the following dates are RESET re 156 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: Van Over Opposition due 06/16/17; reply due 06/26/17; and Motion Hearing is RESET for 7/10/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California SARAH E. MORRISON, State Bar No. 143459 Supervising Deputy Attorney General OLIVIA W. KARLIN, State Bar No. 150432 LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN (Counsel for service) State Bar No. 161896 Deputy Attorneys General 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 879-1299 Fax: (510) 622-2270 E-mail: Laura.Zuckerman@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Plaintiffs California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2:14-cv-00595-WBS-EFB CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL and the TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACCOUNT, AMENDED STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF JUNE 12, 2017 Plaintiffs, HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE LIABILITY OF v. DEFENDANT DAVID VAN OVER; DECLARATION OF LAURA J. JIM DOBBAS, INC., a California corporation; ZUCKERMAN IN SUPPORT THEREOF; ORDER CONTINENTAL RAIL, INC., a Delaware corporation; DAVID VAN OVER, individually; PACIFIC WOOD PRESERVING, a dissolved California Trial Date: September 13, 2017 corporation; WEST COAST WOOD Action Filed: March 3, 2014 PRESERVING, LLC., a Nevada limited liability company; and COLLINS & AIKMAN PRODUCTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. ______________________________________ AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND CROSS CLAIMS 26 27 28 1 AMENDED STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; DECLARATION OF LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN IN SUPPORT THEREOF; [PROPOSED] ORDER (2:14-cv-00595-WBS-EFB) 1 Plaintiffs the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control and the Toxic 2 Substances Control Account (collectively, “DTSC”), through their attorneys, and individual 3 defendant David Van Over, acting in pro per (“Van Over”), hereby submit this amended 4 stipulation requesting that the Court continue the June 12, 2017 hearing date for Plaintiffs’ 5 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the liability of Defendant David Van Over (“Motion”) 6 to July 10, 2017. This continuance will allow Van Over additional time to prepare an opposition 7 to DTSC’s Motion and accommodate DTSC’s counsel’s schedule. 8 The foregoing Amended Stipulation is based on the following facts: 9 1. In this action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 10 Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (“CERCLA”), DTSC seeks to recover response costs it incurred 11 or expects to incur in response to the release and/or threatened release of hazardous substances at, 12 around, and/or beneath the property located at 147 A Street, Elmira, Solano County, CA, 13 identified by Solano County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 142-010-130, 142-010-140 and 142-042- 14 010 (“the Site”) from six (6) defendants. The Court has entered and approved consent decrees 15 resolving the liability of two defendants in this action and has entered default judgments against 16 three (3) others. Van Over is the current owner and operator of the Site, and he is the last 17 remaining defendant in the case. 18 2. On May 5, 2017, DTSC filed a noticed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the 19 liability of Defendant David Van Over (“Motion”), setting the hearing date for the Motion for 20 June 12, 2017. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local Rule 230, Van Over’s 21 opposition was due not less than 14 days preceding the noticed hearing date. Accordingly, Van 22 Over’s opposition was due May 30, 2017. Van Over did not file a timely opposition. Declaration 23 of Laura J. Zuckerman (“Zuckerman Decl.”), ¶ 2. 24 3. On June 2, 2017, Van Over asked for, and Plaintiffs agreed to, a brief continuance of 25 the hearing date to provide Van Over with an opportunity to file an opposition to DTSC’s Motion. 26 Zuckerman Declaration, ¶ 3. Counsel for DTSC plans to be out of the country from June 25 27 through July 7, 2017. Ibid. 28 2 AMENDED STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; DECLARATION OF LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN IN SUPPORT THEREOF; [PROPOSED] ORDER (2:14-cv-00595-WBS-EFB) 4. 1 Based on the foregoing, DTSC and Van Over hereby jointly respectfully request that 2 the Court enter an order continuing the hearing on DTSC’s Motion, and extending the opposition 3 and reply brief filing dates, to enable Van Over the opportunity to file an opposition to the Motion 4 and to accommodate DTSC’s counsel’s schedule, as follows: A. 6 9 10 11 Filing date for DTSC Reply – continued from June 5, 2017 to June 26, 2017, C. Hearing on DTSC’s Motion – continued from June 12, 2017 to July 10, 2017. 16, 2017. 7 8 Filing date for Van Over Opposition – continued from May 30, 2017 to June B. 5 2017. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: 6/7/17___________________ 12 13 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California /s/ Laura J. Zuckerman 14 LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Plaintiffs State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Account 15 16 17 18 19 Dated: _6/7/17__________________ DAVID VAN OVER Defendant 20 /s/ David Van Over 21 DAVID VAN OVER 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 AMENDED STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; DECLARATION OF LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN IN SUPPORT THEREOF; [PROPOSED] ORDER (2:14-cv-00595-WBS-EFB) ORDER 1 2 3 IT IS ORDERED that the deadlines for the above-captioned case are extended as follows: A. Filing date for Van Over Opposition – continued from May 30, 2017 to June 6 B. Filing date for DTSC Reply – continued from June 5, 2017 to June 26, 2017. 7 C. Hearing on DTSC’s Motion – continued from June 12, 2017 to July 10, 2017. 4 5 8 16, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: June 8, 2017 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 AMENDED STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; DECLARATION OF LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN IN SUPPORT THEREOF; [PROPOSED] ORDER (2:14-cv-00595-WBS-EFB) DECLARATION OF LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN 1 2 I, Laura J. Zuckerman, declare as follows: 3 1. I am a Deputy Attorney General with the California Department of Justice, Office of 4 the Attorney General. In that capacity, I am one of the attorneys for plaintiffs California 5 Department of Toxic Substances Control and the Toxic Substances Control Account (collectively, 6 “DTSC”) in this action. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, and, if called to do 7 so, could and would testify competently thereto. 8 9 2. David Van Over (“Van Over”), the last remaining defendant in this action, is representing himself in pro per. On May 5, 2017, DTSC filed a noticed Motion for Partial 10 Summary Judgment on the liability of Defendant David Van Over (“Motion”), setting the hearing 11 date for the Motion for June 12, 2017. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local 12 Rule 230, Van Over’s opposition was due not less than 14 days preceding the noticed hearing 13 date. Accordingly, Van Over’s opposition was due May 30, 2017. Van Over did not file a timely 14 opposition. 15 3. On June 2, 2017, Van Over asked for, and Plaintiffs agreed to, a continuance of the 16 hearing date to provide Van Over with an opportunity to file an opposition to the Motion. 17 Counsel for DTSC plans to be out of the country from June 25 through July 7, 2017. 18 19 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 7, 2017, at Oakland, California. 20 21 22 ______________________________ Laura J. Zuckerman 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 AMENDED STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE; DECLARATION OF LAURA J. ZUCKERMAN IN SUPPORT THEREOF; [PROPOSED] ORDER (2:14-cv-00595-WBS-EFB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?