Clemente v. Parciasepe et al
Filing
107
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 05/31/17 ordering this action is dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(a). The parties mention herein to bear their own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Plummer, M)
1
RIVERA & ASSOCIATES
2
1425 River Park Drive, Suite 250
Sacramento, California 95815
3
Tel: 916-922-1200 Fax: 916 922-1303
4
Jesse M. Rivera, SBN 84259
Shanan L. Hewitt, SBN 200168
Jonathan B. Paul, SBN 215884
Jill B. Nathan, SBN 186136
Jamil R. Ghannam, SBN 300730
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant,
T. PARCIASEPE
8
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
MARCELINO CLEMENTE,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
vs.
T. PARCIASEPE, et al.,
18
19
Defendants.
20
21
) Case No.: 2:14-cv-00611 MCE KJN P
)
) STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH
) PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(1)]
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
It is hereby stipulated, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
22
by and between Plaintiff MARCELINO CLEMENTE, appearing in pro per, and Defendant T.
23
PARCIASEPE, by and through his attorney Shanan L. Hewitt, that this action is dismissed in its
24
entirety with prejudice.
25
In consideration of the Stipulation entered by the above-named parties to the United
26
States District Court Eastern District of California action, Clemente v. Parciasepe, et al, Case
27
2:14-cv-00611 MCE KJN, this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of
28
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) with the parties mentioned herein to bear their own fees and costs.
Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice [FRCP 41(a)(1)]
Page 1
1
Dated: 5/25/17
/s/ Marcelino Clemente
MARCELINO CLEMENTE
Plaintiff, In Pro Per
Dated: 5/25/17
/s/ Shanan L. Hewitt
SHANAN L. HEWITT
Attorney for Defendant
T. PARCIASEPE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 31, 2017
11
12
13
14
15
16
Cle611.dis
KC
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice [FRCP 41(a)(1)]
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?