Clemente v. Parciasepe et al
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/29/2015 ORDERING plaintiff to file his opposition to the motion for summary judgment on or before 8/28/2015. Defendant's reply shall be filed 7 days thereafter.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARCELINO CLEMENTE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0611 MCE KJN P
v.
ORDER
T. PARCIASEPE,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. On July 13, 2015, the court
17
18
requested that the litigation coordinator at Mule Creek State Prison advise the court of plaintiff’s
19
access to his legal materials, including documents he had given to another inmate, Alonzo Joseph.
20
On July 15, 2015, counsel for defendant filed a response, indicating that Mr. Joseph sent the
21
opposition to defendant’s counsel, but apparently did not file it with the court. On July 23, 2015,
22
the litigation coordinator responded, confirming that Mr. Joseph sent the document to defendant’s
23
counsel, and noting that plaintiff had received his copy and now has access to his legal materials.
24
On July 22, 2015, plaintiff confirmed that he had received the opposition, but that the proposed
25
opposition is not complete, and therefore requested an opportunity to submit his opposition within
26
the forty-five day extension of time provided to plaintiff in the July 13, 2015 order.
27
////
28
////
1
2
3
Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request is granted. Plaintiff shall file his opposition on
or before August 28, 2015; defendant’s reply is due seven days thereafter.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file his opposition to the
4
motion for summary judgment on or before August 28, 2015. Defendant’s reply shall be filed
5
seven days thereafter.
6
Dated: July 29, 2015
7
8
9
clem0611.eotc
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?