Cooley v. City of Vallejo et al
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/24/2015 ORDERING 56 Plaintiff's successor or representative shall file a motion for substitution within 90 days from the date of this order. The motion shall be supported by briefing and adequate supporting documentation permitting the court to ascertain and verify that the movant is the proper successor or representative under applicable probate or intestate succession law. The motion shall also be noticed for hearing in accordance with Local Rule 230. Other than the deadline to move for substitution, all currently scheduled dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED, subject to rescheduling at a later juncture, if appropriate. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FREDERICK MARCELES COOLEY,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0620-TLN-KJN PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER REGARDING
CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,
15
STATEMENT OF DEATH
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action on March 6, 2014. (ECF
18
No. 1.) The operative first amended complaint asserts 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims for excessive
19
force in violation of the Fourth Amendment against defendants and City of Vallejo police officers
20
Brett Clark and Dustin Joseph, as well as a Monell claim against defendant City of Vallejo. (ECF
21
No. 20.)
22
On April 23, 2015, defendants filed and served a statement of death, indicating that
23
plaintiff has died. (ECF No. 56.) Accordingly, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
24
25(a), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. Plaintiff’s successor or representative shall file a motion for substitution within ninety
26
(90) days from the date of this order. The motion shall be supported by briefing and adequate
27
supporting documentation permitting the court to ascertain and verify that the movant is the
28
proper successor or representative under applicable probate or intestate succession law. The
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
motion shall also be noticed for hearing in accordance with Local Rule 230.
2. Failure to file such a motion by the required deadline will result in a recommendation
that the action be dismissed.
3. Other than the deadline to move for substitution, all currently scheduled dates and
deadlines in this action are VACATED, subject to rescheduling at a later juncture, if appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 24, 2015
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?