Schema v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al.

Filing 60

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/1/15 ORDERING that plaintiff is GRANTED an additional three week extension of time to file his objections to the findings and recommendations. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
GREGORY T. BRODERICK
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
Attorneys for the United States et al.
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

JOHN D. SCHEMA,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

No. 2:14-cv-0630-MCE-DAD-PS
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

Defendants

13
14
15

On January 26, 2015, Judge Drozd entered Findings and Recommendations holding that

16

Plaintiff’s sole remaining cause of action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. These

17

were served by mail on pro se Plaintiff on or about January 27, 2015. The Court previously approved an

18

extension for Plaintiff to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations from February 6, 2015, to

19

February 27, 2015. (Dkt. No. 58). On February 25, 2015, Plaintiff contacted the undersigned to request

20

an additional three weeks. The United States has no objection but is unlikely to agree to any further

21

extension. Now wherefore, the parties hereby stipulate to such an extension.

22

Respectfully Submitted,

23

Dated: February 26, 2015

24
25
26
27

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
/s/ Gregory T. Broderick
GREGORY T. BRODERICK
Assistant United States Attorney
/s/ John D. Schema (authorized 02/25/2015)
JOHN D. SCHEMA, in pro per

28
29
30

1

ORDER

1
2
3

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.1
Dated: March 1, 2015

4
5
6
7
8

dad1\orders.pro se\schema0630.stip.eot2.ord.doc

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

1

The court will not grant any further extensions of time for this purpose absent a compelling
showing of good cause.
2