Hartline v. National University

Filing 83

ORDER adopting in full 74 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/2/17. Defendants 66 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.(Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DOYLE DEAN HARTLINE,

12

No. 2:14-cv-0635 KJM AC (PS)

Plaintiff,

13

v.

ORDER

14

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY,

15

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per and in forma pauperis. The matter was

17
18

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On August 18, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which

19
20

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

21

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty one days. ECF No. 74. Defendant

22

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 77. Plaintiff has filed a

23

response to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 78.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the

26

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 18, 2016 (ECF No. 74) are adopted in

3
4
5

full; and
2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 66) is denied.
DATED: March 2, 2017

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2