Center for Competitive Politics v. Harris

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/28/14. Case STAYED pending resolution and issuance of mandate by the Ninth Circuit regarding plaintiff's preliminary injunction appeal. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083 Supervising Deputy Attorney General ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON, State Bar No. 207650 Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5509 Fax: (415) 703-5480 E-mail: Alexandra.RobertGordon@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Attorney General Harris 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE POLITICS, v. 2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER RE Plaintiff, STAYING DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDINGS PENDING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION APPEAL KAMALA HARRIS, in her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Courtroom: 7, 14th Floor Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. Action Filed: March 7, 2014 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER (2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD) 1 Plaintiff Center for Competitive Politics and Defendant Attorney General Kamala D. 2 Harris (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and 3 agree as follows: 4 5 6 WHEREAS, on May 14, 2014, this Court issued an Order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction; WHEREAS, on May 15, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal in the Ninth Circuit 7 Court of Appeals as to this Court’s May 14, 2014 Order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for a 8 preliminary injunction; 9 WHEREAS, in light of the pending appeal in the Ninth Circuit, and in the interest of 10 judicial economy and efficiency and to save judicial and party resources, the Parties have agreed 11 to stay district court proceedings pending appeal. 12 13 14 THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby stipulated that: The district court proceedings in this case shall be stayed pending resolution of Plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction appeal and until the issuance of the mandate by the Ninth Circuit. 15 16 Dated: May 21, 2014 Respectfully submitted, KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California TAMAR PACHTER Supervising Deputy Attorney General 17 18 19 /s/ Alexandra Robert Gordon ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Attorney General Harris 20 21 22 Dated: May 21, 2014 By: GURA & POSSESSKY, PLLC 23 /s/ Alan Gura ALAN GURA Attorneys for Plaintiff Center For Competitive Politics 24 25 26 27 2 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER (2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD) 1 Dated: May 21, 2014 By: CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE POLITICS 2 /s/ Allen Dickerson ALLEN DICKERSON* Attorneys for Plaintiff Center For Competitive Politics * (Admitted pro hac vice) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Order Having considered the above stipulation of the parties, proceedings in this case are STAYED pending resolution of Plaintiff’s preliminary injunction appeal, ECF No. 18, and until the issuance of the mandate by the Ninth Circuit (Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-15978). The stay in this matter shall be lifted automatically without further action by this Court upon the issuance of said mandate. Defendant’s last day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be no later than 21 days after entry of the mandate by the Ninth Circuit regarding Plaintiff’s preliminary injunction appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 Dated: May 28, 2014 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 3 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER (2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?