Center for Competitive Politics v. Harris
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/28/14. Case STAYED pending resolution and issuance of mandate by the Ninth Circuit regarding plaintiff's preliminary injunction appeal. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON, State Bar No.
207650
Deputy Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-5509
Fax: (415) 703-5480
E-mail: Alexandra.RobertGordon@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
Attorney General Harris
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE
POLITICS,
v.
2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
Plaintiff, STAYING DISTRICT COURT
PROCEEDINGS PENDING
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION APPEAL
KAMALA HARRIS, in her Official
Capacity as Attorney General of the State of
California,
Courtroom: 7, 14th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
Action Filed: March 7, 2014
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER (2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD)
1
Plaintiff Center for Competitive Politics and Defendant Attorney General Kamala D.
2
Harris (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and
3
agree as follows:
4
5
6
WHEREAS, on May 14, 2014, this Court issued an Order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for a
preliminary injunction;
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal in the Ninth Circuit
7
Court of Appeals as to this Court’s May 14, 2014 Order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for a
8
preliminary injunction;
9
WHEREAS, in light of the pending appeal in the Ninth Circuit, and in the interest of
10
judicial economy and efficiency and to save judicial and party resources, the Parties have agreed
11
to stay district court proceedings pending appeal.
12
13
14
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby stipulated that:
The district court proceedings in this case shall be stayed pending resolution of Plaintiffs’
preliminary injunction appeal and until the issuance of the mandate by the Ninth Circuit.
15
16
Dated: May 21, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
TAMAR PACHTER
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
17
18
19
/s/ Alexandra Robert Gordon
ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Attorney General Harris
20
21
22
Dated: May 21, 2014
By: GURA & POSSESSKY, PLLC
23
/s/ Alan Gura
ALAN GURA
Attorneys for Plaintiff Center For
Competitive Politics
24
25
26
27
2
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER (2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD)
1
Dated: May 21, 2014
By: CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE POLITICS
2
/s/ Allen Dickerson
ALLEN DICKERSON*
Attorneys for Plaintiff Center For
Competitive Politics
* (Admitted pro hac vice)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Order
Having considered the above stipulation of the parties, proceedings in this case are
STAYED pending resolution of Plaintiff’s preliminary injunction appeal, ECF No. 18, and until
the issuance of the mandate by the Ninth Circuit (Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-15978). The
stay in this matter shall be lifted automatically without further action by this Court upon the
issuance of said mandate.
Defendant’s last day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be no
later than 21 days after entry of the mandate by the Ninth Circuit regarding Plaintiff’s preliminary
injunction appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dated: May 28, 2014
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER (2:14-cv-00636-MCE-DAD)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?