Hicks v. City of Vallejo et al
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/26/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 5/22/15 MOTION for leave to file a third amended complaint 27 is GRANTED; The proposed third amended complaint filed 5/22/15 27 is deemed the operative complaint; and Defendants' answer filed 5/6/15 26 is deemed the answer to the 5/22/15 third amended complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TYRONE EDWARD HICKS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0669 DAD PS
v.
ORDER
CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
This action came before the court on June 26, 2015, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion for
17
18
leave to file a third amended complaint.1 Assistant City Attorney Kelly Trujillo appeared
19
telephonically on behalf of the defendants and plaintiff Tyrone Hicks appeared in person on his
20
own behalf.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the
21
22
reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s May 22, 2015 motion for leave to file a third amended complaint (Dkt. No.
23
24
27) is granted;
2. The proposed third amended complaint filed May 22, 2015 (Dkt. No. 27) is deemed the
25
26
27
28
operative complaint; and
1
The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28
U.S.C. ' 636(c)(1). (Dkt. No. 25.)
1
1
3. Defendants’ answer filed May 6, 2015 (Dkt. No. 26) is deemed the answer to the May
2
22, 2015 third amended complaint.
3
Dated: June 26, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
9
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.consent\hicks0669.oah.062615.docx
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?