Hicks v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/26/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 5/22/15 MOTION for leave to file a third amended complaint 27 is GRANTED; The proposed third amended complaint filed 5/22/15 27 is deemed the operative complaint; and Defendants' answer filed 5/6/15 26 is deemed the answer to the 5/22/15 third amended complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TYRONE EDWARD HICKS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-0669 DAD PS

v.

ORDER

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
This action came before the court on June 26, 2015, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion for

17
18

leave to file a third amended complaint.1 Assistant City Attorney Kelly Trujillo appeared

19

telephonically on behalf of the defendants and plaintiff Tyrone Hicks appeared in person on his

20

own behalf.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the

21
22

reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s May 22, 2015 motion for leave to file a third amended complaint (Dkt. No.

23
24

27) is granted;
2. The proposed third amended complaint filed May 22, 2015 (Dkt. No. 27) is deemed the

25
26
27
28

operative complaint; and
1

The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28
U.S.C. ' 636(c)(1). (Dkt. No. 25.)
1

1

3. Defendants’ answer filed May 6, 2015 (Dkt. No. 26) is deemed the answer to the May

2

22, 2015 third amended complaint.

3

Dated: June 26, 2015

4
5
6
7
8
9

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.consent\hicks0669.oah.062615.docx

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2