Hicks v. City of Vallejo et al
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/3/2016 GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 50 Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time; ORDERING the defendants to produce the video at issue to the plaintiff within fourteen days; DENYING 54 Application for an Order Shortening Time. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TYRONE EDWARD HICKS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0669 CKD PS (TEMP)
v.
ORDER
CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
This action came before the court on March 2, 2016, for hearing of defendants’ motion to
17
18
modify.1 Attorney Kelly Trujillo appeared on behalf of the defendants and plaintiff Tyrone Hicks
19
appeared on his own behalf.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the
20
21
reasons set forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ February 16, 2016 motion to modify (Dkt. No. 50) is granted in part and
22
23
denied in part;
2. Defendants shall produce the video at issue to plaintiff, after blurring the nude private
24
25
areas of the non-party, within fourteen days; and
26
/////
27
28
1
The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28
U.S.C. ' 636(c)(1). (Dkt. No. 25.)
1
3. Plaintiff’s February 18, 2016 application for an order shortening time (Dkt. No. 54) is
1
2
denied.
3
Dated: March 3, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
BVD\hicks0669.oah.030216.docx
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?