Hicks v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 74

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/25/2016 ORDERING that, having reviewed the edited video produced to plaintiff (re 71 Minute Order) and the unedited original video, the court finds that, aside from minimal blurring of a nude image, the edited video is a complete and accurate copy of the original video. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TYRONE EDWARD HICKS,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-0669 CKD PS (TEMP)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On March 22, 2016, the court issued a minute order noting that the parties had informally

18

contacted the court regarding a discovery dispute concerning the accuracy of a video produced by

19

defendants. Accordingly, the court ordered defendants to submit to the court a copy of the edited

20

video produced to plaintiff and a copy of the unedited original video. (Dkt. No. 71.)

21

Having reviewed the edited video produced to plaintiff and the unedited original video,

22

the court finds that, aside from minimal blurring of a nude image, the edited video is a complete

23

and accurate copy of the original video.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 25, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

BVD\hicks0669.disc.dis.

1