Hicks v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 92

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/6/16 GRANTING 73 Plaintiff's Motion to modify the scheduling order and DENYING 76 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and Motion for Sanctions. Within 14 days of the 5/4/1 6 hearing defendants shall produce to plaintiff items J, L, M, X and Y, as well as any recorded interviews of any City of Vallejo police officers, identified in the Moore v. City of Vallejo stipulated protective order; Within 14 days of the 5/4/16 hearing defendants shall submit to the court for in camera review a copy of item V as identified in the Moore v. City of Vallejo stipulated protective order; Defendants' production is subject to the protective order filed on January 22, 2016 (ECF No. 45); and all pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed by 7/13/16. A Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/21/2016 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Jury Trial set for 11/28/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Jackson, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TYRONE EDWARD HICKS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-0669 CKD PS (TEMP)

v.

ORDER

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
This action came before the court on May 4, 2016, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to

17
18

modify the scheduling order and for terminating sanctions.1 Attorney Kelly Trujillo appeared on

19

behalf of the defendants and plaintiff Tyrone Hicks appeared on his own behalf.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the

20
21

reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s March 24, 2016 motion to modify the scheduling order (Dkt. No. 73) is

22
23

granted;

24

2. Plaintiff’s March 29, 2016 motion for terminating sanctions (Dkt. No. 76) is denied;

25

3. Within fourteen days of the May 4, 2016 hearing defendants shall produce to plaintiff

26

items J, L, M, X and Y, as well as any recorded interviews of any City of Vallejo police officers,

27
28

1

The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28
U.S.C. ' 636(c)(1). (Dkt. No. 25.)
1

1
2

identified in the Moore v. City of Vallejo stipulated protective order;
4. Within fourteen days of the May 4, 2016 hearing defendants shall submit to the court

3

for in camera review a copy of item V as identified in the Moore v. City of Vallejo stipulated

4

protective order;

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

5. Defendants’ production is subject to the protective order filed on January 22, 2016
(ECF No. 45);
6. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed by July
13, 2016.
7. A final pretrial conference is set for September 21, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom
no. 24 before the undersigned.
8. This matter is set for a jury trial not to exceed five court days on November 28, 2016

12

at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24 before the undersigned.

13

Dated: May 6, 2016

14
15

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1
2
BVD\hicks0669.oah.050416.docx

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3