The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. California State Grange

Filing 104

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/4/2016 re 100 Defendant's Ex Parte Motion to Continue 88 Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Stay or Suspend Injunction Pending Appeal: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1) Defendant's Ex Parte Motion is GRANTED ON THE CONDITIONS that: i) defendant compensate plaintiff and its counsel for any non-refundable travel arrangements that have already been made for the January 11, 2016 hearing; (ii) the parties, and all those acting in c oncert with them, understand and agree that unless and until otherwise ordered, the 85 , 86 Court's September 30, 2015 injunction, remains in full force and effect and shall be complied with in letter and in spirit; 2) The January 11, 2016 he aring date on 88 Defendant's Motion to Stay Injunction Pending Appeal is hereby VACATED; 3) A new hearing date on 88 Defendants Motion to Stay Injunction Pending Appeal is set February 8, 2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; and 4) Defendant shall file its reply to 99 Plaintiffs opposition to defendants Motion to Stay Injunction Pending Appeal no later than February 1, 2016. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 13 14 THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY, a District of Columbia nonprofit corporation, 17 ORDER Plaintiff, 15 16 Civ No. 2:14-676 WBS DAD v. CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE, a California corporation, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE, a California corporation, 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff, v. THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY, a District of Columbia nonprofit corporation, Defendant. 28 1 1 Having considered defendant’s Ex Parte Motion and 2 plaintiff’s opposition to that Motion, (Docket Nos. 100, 102), IT 3 IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 (1) Defendant’s Ex Parte Motion to Continue Hearing on 5 Defendant’s Motion to Stay Injunction Pending Appeal 6 (Docket No. 100) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED ON 7 THE CONDITIONS that: 8 (i) 9 defendant compensate plaintiff and its counsel for any non-refundable travel arrangements that have 10 already been made for the January 11, 2016 11 hearing; and 12 (ii) the parties, and all those acting in concert with 13 them, understand and agree that unless and until 14 otherwise ordered, the court’s September 30, 2015 15 injunction, (Docket Nos. 85-86), remains in full 16 force and effect and shall be complied with in 17 letter and in spirit. 18 (2) The January 11, 2016 hearing date on defendant’s Motion 19 to Stay Injunction Pending Appeal (Docket No. 88) is 20 hereby VACATED; 21 (3) A new hearing date on defendant’s Motion to Stay 22 Injunction Pending Appeal (Docket No. 88) is set for 23 February 8, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5; and 24 (4) Defendant shall file its reply to plaintiff’s 25 opposition to defendant’s Motion to Stay Injunction 26 Pending Appeal (Docket No. 99) no later than February 27 1, 2016. 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 1 Dated: January 4, 2016 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?