The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. California State Grange

Filing 267

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/27/2018 ORDERING that Defendant shall produce the Hartland Promissory Note to plaintiff on or before 10/2/2018. Defendant's objection to the presence of Mr. Komski at the judgment debtor examination is OVERRULED. The judgment debtor exam is CONTINUED to 10/3/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDARY, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 No. 2:14-cv-0676 WBS DB ORDER v. CALIFORNIA GUILD, formerly doing business as “California State Grange”, 17 Defendant. 18 19 This action came before the court on September 27, 2018, for hearing during the parties’ 20 judgment debtor examination. (ECF No. 266.) Attorney Mark Serlin appeared on behalf of the 21 plaintiff. Attorney Mark Ellis appeared on behalf of the defendant. Upon consideration of the arguments made at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth on 22 23 the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant shall produce the Hartland Promissory Note to plaintiff on or before 24 25 October 2, 2018; 2. Defendant’s objection to the presence of Mr. Komski at the judgment debtor 26 27 examination is overruled; and 28 //// 1 1 3. The September 27, 2018 judgment debtor examination is continued to October 3, 2 2018, at 9:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in 3 Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned. 4 DATED: September 27, 2018 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.civil\grange0676.oah.092718 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?