The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. California State Grange
Filing
288
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/1/2019 GRANTING Stipulated Request for Dismissal of Action. This matter is DISMISSED in its entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
MARTIN N. JENSEN (SBN 232231)
THOMAS L. RIORDAN (SBN 104827)
PORTER SCOTT
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: 916.929.1481
Facsimile: 916.927.3706
Email: mjensen@porterscott.com
Email: triordan@porterscott.com
JAMES L. BIKOFF (Pro Hac Vice)
BRUCE A. McDONALD (Pro Hac Vice)
HOLLY B. LANCE (Pro Hac Vice)
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL LLP
1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W., Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20007
Telephone: 202.263.4341
Facsimile: 202.263.4329
Email: jbikoff@sgrlaw.com
Email: bmcdonald@sgrlaw.com
Email: hlance@sgrlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16 THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE
ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY,
17
Plaintiff,
18
v.
Case No. 2:14-cv-00676-WBS-DB
19
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
20
21
CALIFORNIA GUILD, formerly doing
business as “California State Grange,”
The Honorable William B. Shubb
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiff the National Grange of the Order of Patrons of
Husbandry and Defendant California Guild, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned
matter shall be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs.
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-00676-WBS-DB
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: November 1, 2019
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ACTION
CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-00676-WBS-DB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?