The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. California State Grange

Filing 40

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/20/15 re: 39 ORDERING 20 Status (Pretrial Conference) Scheduling Order's status modified to permit depositions of Defendant and its principal, Robert McFarland. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MICHAEL TURRILL (SBN 185263) ARENT FOX LLP 555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065 Telephone: 213.629.7400 Facsimile: 213.629.7401 Email: Michael.Turrill@arentfox.com RANDALL BRATER (SBN 211140) (admitted to practice in California) ARENT FOX LLP 1717 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-5344 Telephone: 202.857.6000 Facsimile: 202.857.6395 Email: Randall.Brater@arentfox.com 9 [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 17 THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY, a District of Columbia nonprofit corporation, 18 Plaintiff, 16 19 v. 20 No. 2:14-cv-00676-WBS-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER TO PERMIT DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANT AND ITS PRINCIPAL, ROBERT MCFARLAND CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE, a California corporation, 21 Defendant. 22 23 AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM. 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES JOINT STIPULATION/[PROPOSED] ORDER 2:14-CV-00676-WBS-DAD 1 Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate to modify the Court’s Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 2 Order to permit Plaintiff to take two depositions, one of Defendant California State Grange, and 3 the other of its president, Robert McFarland, between May 13-15, 2015. The grounds and 4 authorities in support of this motion are as follows: 5 1. 6 7 On July 3, 2014, the Court issued its Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order, Doc. 20, which provides that discovery shall be completed by April 24, 2015. 2. On September 23, 2014, Plaintiff noticed the depositions of Defendant and its 8 principal, Robert McFarland, to take place on January 8-9, 2015 (after Defendant 9 had the opportunity to respond to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production of 10 11 Documents, Interrogatories, and Requests for Admission). 3. By agreement between Plaintiff’s undersigned counsel and Defendant’s then- 12 counsel, Maralee Eriksen of Boutin Jones, the two depositions were reset for 13 February 23-24, 2015. 14 4. Subsequently, however, Defendant substituted its counsel, necessitating a 15 postponement of the depositions. In January 2015, Defendant initially substituted 16 Michael Chase of Boutin Jones for Maralee Eriksen of that same firm. Doc. 31. 17 5. Then Defendant substituted counsel once again, replacing the firm of Boutin Jones 18 with its current counsel, Anthony Ellrod of Manning & Kass Ellrod, Ramirez, 19 Trester, LLP. The substitution notice was filed on March 10, 2015, after 20 Defendant's principal, Robert McFarland, signed the substitution of counsel. Doc. 21 35. 22 6. As soon as the second substitution of defense counsel was effected, counsel for 23 Plaintiff consistently persisted with their efforts to schedule the depositions within 24 the current discovery deadline, but the deponent and defense counsel were not 25 available until after the close of discovery. Despite both parties' best efforts and 26 due to multiple scheduling conflicts, the closest available dates Defendant and 27 both parties' counsel are available for depositions are May 14-15, 2015. 28 Moreover, defense counsel anticipates filing a Motion to Consolidate and Extend A RENT F OX LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES -1- JOINT STIPULATION/[PROPOSED] ORDER 2:14-CV-00676-WBS-DAD 1 Deadlines due to its recent association as counsel and the related matter of 2 California State Grange v. The Grange of the State of California's Order of Patrons 3 of Husbandry, Chartered (2:15-cv-00317-WBS-DAD) also pending before this 4 Court. Plaintiff’s counsel does not intend to consent to or acquiesce in that 5 contemplated defense motion, or to any extension of the discovery deadline 6 beyond the scheduling of the two depositions. 7 8 9 7. The dates of May 14-15, 2015 for the two depositions are acceptable and agreeable to both parties and their respective counsel, subject to the Court’s approval. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, by counsel, hereby stipulate and respectfully 10 request that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order be modified only so far as to permit Plaintiff to 11 take the depositions of Defendant California State Grange and Robert McFarland, between 12 May 14-15, 2015. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES -2- JOINT STIPULATION/[PROPOSED] ORDER 2:14-CV-00676-WBS-DAD 1 Dated: April 17, 2015 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER, LLP 2 3 By:/s/ Anthony Ellrod ANTHONY ELLROD 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE 6 7 Dated: April 17, 2015 ARENT FOX LLP 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 By:/s/ Michael L. Turrill MICHAEL TURRILL RANDALL BRATER JAMES L. BIKOFF (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) DAVID K. HEASLEY (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL LLP 1055 Thomas Jefferson Street NW Washington, DC 20007 T: 202.263.4300; F: 202.263.4329 Email: jbikoff@sgrlaw.com dheasley@sgrlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES -3- JOINT STIPULATION/[PROPOSED] ORDER 2:14-CV-00676-WBS-DAD 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 20, 2015 4 5 6 7 Ddad1\orders.civil grange0676.stip.eot.ord.doc 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES -4- JOINT STIPULATION/[PROPOSED] ORDER 2:14-CV-00676-WBS-DAD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?