The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. California State Grange

Filing 70

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/14/2015 DENYING 69 Defendant's Request to Appear by Telephone at the 8/17/2015 Final Pretrial Conference and Status Conference. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 THE NATIONAL GRANGE OF THE Case No. 2:14-cv-00676-WBS-DAD 13 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY ORDER OF PATRONS OF 12 HUSBANDRY, a District of Columbia nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE, a 16 California corporation, Defendant. 17 18 19 CALIFORNIA STATE GRANGE, a 20 California corporation, Counter-Claimant, 21 22 v. THE GRANGE OF THE STATE OF 23 CALIFORNIA'S ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY, 24 CHARTERED, 25 Counter-Defendant. 26 27 28 The court has received defendant California State Grange's request to allow 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE 1 counsel Jenifer C. Wallis to appear telephonically at the August 17, 2015 Final Pretrial 2 Conference and Status Conference. Because the Final Pretrial Conference is 3 tantamount to the first day of trial, it is not the practice of this court to permit 4 telephonic appearance at such conference. See Rule 16(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil 5 Procedure, which provides that the conference “must be attended by at least one 6 attorney who will conduct the trial for each party . . .” There has been no showing that 7 a personal appearance in this case would cause such hardship as to justify an exception 8 to that practice. 9 The request to appear telephonically at the Final Pretrial Conference is therefore 10 11 DENIED. Dated: August 14, 2015 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?