Johnson v. Vuong et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/20/16 ORDERING that This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21); All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and the caption on documents filed in this action shall be No. 2:14-cv-0709 KJM DB with the "PS" designation being eliminated.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0709 KJM DB PS v. ORDER KARL VUONG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On January 13, 2016, the assigned District Judge referred this matter to the undersigned 17 18 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) because all defendants were proceeding pro se at that time. 19 (ECF No. 37.) On December 19, 2016, however, attorney Richard Morin appeared on behalf of 20 several defendants. (ECF No. 56.) Because all defendants are no longer proceeding pro se, Local Rule 302(c)(21) no longer 21 22 applies and, accordingly, the case will be referred back to the assigned District Judge. Therefore, 23 all pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed for hearing before the 24 District Judge assigned to this action. The assigned magistrate judge shall continue to perform all 25 duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20). 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21); 4 2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and 5 3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be 6 7 8 No. 2:14-cv-0709 KJM DB with the “PS” designation being eliminated. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 20, 2016 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.pro se\johnson0709.referback.ord 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?