Giraldes v. Oania, et al.
Filing
123
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/21/18: 118 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed December 13, 2017, are adopted in full. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and/or Stay 113 is denied. Renewed Motion for Terminating Sanctions or Involuntary Dismissal 112 stands submitted for decision before the magistrate judge. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY GIRALDES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-726-JAM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
OANIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 13, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 13, 2017, are adopted in full;
27
28
/////
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s “Motion for Extension of Time and/or Stay,” (ECF No. 113) is denied; and
2
3. As plaintiff has filed his opposition to defendants’ “Renewed Motion for Terminating
3
Sanctions or Involuntary Dismissal” (ECF No. 112) and defendants have filed a reply thereto, the
4
motion stands submitted for decision before the magistrate judge.
5
DATED: February 21, 2018
6
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?