Giraldes v. Oania, et al.
Filing
93
ORDER denying 91 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/03/17. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY GIRALDES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-726-JAM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
OANIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. He has again requested that the court appoint counsel. ECF No. 91. Defendants
19
have filed an opposition. ECF No. 92.
20
As plaintiff has been previously informed (ECF Nos. 19, 36), district courts lack authority
21
to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States
22
Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an
23
attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v.
24
Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th
25
Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must
26
consider the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate
27
his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560
28
/////
1
1
F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009). Having considered those factors, the court still finds there are no
2
exceptional circumstances in this case.1
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for appointment of
4
counsel (ECF No. 91) is denied.
5
DATED: May 3, 2017.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff states that “Magistrate Delaney has ordered [him] not to file documents with the
court, or defense counsel, in [Giraldes v. Beard, 2:14-cv-1780-CKD].” Any such order as to what
plaintiff may or may not file in another action where he is represented by counsel has no bearing
on what plaintiff may file in this action, where he proceeds pro se.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?