Gonzalez, Jr. v. Gamberg, et al.

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/28/15 ORDERING that within fourteen days from the date of this order defendants shall file and serve a response to the equitable tolling argument raised in Plaintiff's objections. Plaintiff may file and serve a reply within fourteen daysthereafter.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE GONZALEZ, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0737 KJM CKD P v. ORDER R. GAMBERG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 18, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. In his objections, plaintiff argues for the first time that his state 24 law battery claims against defendants Gamberg, Wheeler and Lively are saved from dismissal as 25 time-barred by equitable tolling principles arising under California law. Good cause appearing, 26 defendants will be directed to file a response to plaintiff’s equitable tolling argument. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days from 2 the date of this order defendants shall file and serve a response to the equitable tolling argument 3 raised in plaintiff’s objections. Plaintiff may file and serve a reply within fourteen days 4 thereafter. 5 DATED: September 28, 2015. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?