Rowland v. Unknown

Filing 22

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/29/14 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEITH ROLAND,

12
13
14

No. 2:14-cv-0739 KJM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

K. OSMAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By order filed July 24, 2014, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to

18

file an amended complaint was granted. On September 16, 2014, plaintiff was granted an

19

additional thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have

20

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

21

court’s order.

22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

28

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: October 29, 2014

4
5

/rola0739.fta

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2