Valerio v. Compass Bank

Filing 47

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/3/2016 ORDERING Plaintiff Gloria Valerio to complete her deposition by 4/1/2016; ORDERING Plaintiff Gloria Valerio to attend and complete her independent medical examination with Dr. Scott on 3/2/2016; CAUTIONING all parties that any violation of this Stipulation and/or Order shall subject the offending party to appropriate sanctions, as determined by the Court. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 GAVRILOV & BROOKS J. EDWARD BROOKS (SBN 247767) CECILIA L. MARTIN (SBN 301027) 2315 Capitol Avenue Sacramento, California 95816 Telephone: (916) 504-0529 Facsimile: (916) 473-5870 Email: ebrooks@gavrilovelaw.com cmartin@gavrilovlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff GLORIA VALERIO JACKSON LEWIS P.C. CAROLYN G. BURNETTE (SBN 191294) DOUGLAS M. EGBERT (SBN 265062) 801 K Street, Suite 2300 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 341-0404 Facsimile: (916) 341-0141 Email: burnettec@jacksonlewis.com egbertd@jacksonlewis.com Attorneys for Defendant COMPASS BANK 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 19 20 23 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING COMPLETION OF PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION AND INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION Plaintiff, 21 22 Case 2:14-CV-00741-JAM-KJN GLORIA VALERIO, v. COMPASS BANK; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Complaint Filed: Trial Date: Defendants. 24 01/31/14 04/24/17 25 26 27 28 /// /// 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COMPLETION OF PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION AND INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION 1 I. 2 3 STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION GLORIA VALERIO (“Plaintiff”) and COMPASS BANK (“Defendant”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 4 WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties began cooperatively conferring on scheduling 5 Plaintiff’s deposition at the outset of this case, and agreed that, given the allegations and claims at 6 issue, Defendant could go beyond the seven hour limit set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil 7 Procedure; 8 WHEREAS, Defendant noticed Plaintiff’s deposition for December 2 and 3, 2014; 9 WHEREAS, just prior to her deposition, Plaintiff’s prior counsel notified Defendant that 10 Plaintiff needed several accommodations for medical issues, which postponed the deposition; 11 12 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s prior counsel later recanted that Plaintiff needed medical accommodations to be deposed; 13 WHEREAS, due to Plaintiff’s prior counsel’s trial schedule and other scheduling 14 conflicts, the Parties were not able to schedule Plaintiff’s deposition until February 3, 2015; 15 WHEREAS, Defendant conducted Plaintiff’s deposition on February 3 and 4, 2015; 16 WHEREAS, due to multiple extended breaks by Plaintiff, her need for an interpreter and 17 other factors, Plaintiff did not complete her deposition; 18 19 WHEREAS, the break time for the two days of deposition totaled about four hours and forty-three minutes; 20 WHEREAS, because of Plaintiff’s frequent breaks and the slowed pace for interpretation, 21 Defendant was only able to obtain 148 pages of deposition testimony on day one and 114 pages 22 on day two – less than half the total number of pages defense counsel is typically able to obtain in 23 a single day of deposition; 24 25 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s prior counsel adjourned the deposition on February 4, 2015 because counsel had another appointment; 26 WHEREAS, Plaintiff stipulated that because of the extent of the delays during her 27 deposition and the issues with interpretation, her deposition would continue until completed; 28 /// 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COMPLETION OF PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION AND INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff represented that she was not available to complete her deposition in 2 February 2015; 3 4 WHEREAS, Defendant made good faith efforts to schedule Plaintiff’s deposition in early March 2015; 5 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s prior counsel informed defense counsel that Plaintiff was medically unable to complete her deposition; 7 WHEREAS, Defendant requested to Plaintiff’s prior counsel that Plaintiff provide a 8 medical note clarifying whether she could appear to complete her deposition and, if she could not, 9 to provide an estimated date on which her condition was expected to improve such that she would 10 be medically able to testify; 11 12 WHEREAS, the Parties rescheduled Plaintiff’s deposition several times thereafter, but Plaintiff’s prior counsel repeatedly cancelled on behalf of Plaintiff; 13 14 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s prior counsel never produced any clarifying medical note indicating Plaintiff could not complete her deposition; 15 16 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s prior counsel was granted leave to withdraw from representing Plaintiff on or about September 2, 2015; 17 18 WHEREAS, the Court stayed all activity in the case from September 2, 2015 until October 31, 2015 to allow Plaintiff time to engage new counsel; 19 20 WHEREAS, once the stay was lifted, Defendant attempted to meet and confer with Plaintiff directly regarding completion of her deposition; 21 WHEREAS, Plaintiff obtained new counsel on or about December 4, 2015; 22 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s new counsel has assured defense counsel that Plaintiff understands 23 she must complete her deposition and that she will do so; 24 WHEREAS, to date, Plaintiff has not completed her deposition; 25 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO, 26 THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL COMPLETE 27 HER DEPOSITION IN ITS ENTIRETY BY APRIL 1, 2016. THE PARTIES FURTHER 28 /// 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COMPLETION OF PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION AND INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION 1 AGREE THAT THIS STIPULATION SHALL BE IN EFFECT WHETHER OR NOT THE 2 COURT SIGNS THE [PROPOSED] ORDER BELOW. 3 II. 4 5 STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAM Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 6 WHEREAS, in late February 2015, defense counsel informed Plaintiff’s counsel that the 7 nature and severity of Plaintiff’s allegations regarding her psychiatric condition and the related 8 damages she is seeking required that Plaintiff submit to an independent medical examination 9 (“IME”); 10 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s allegations include that Defendant purportedly caused her to become suicidal, and to have an “involuntary 5150 hold” placed on her; 12 WHEREAS, the primary purpose of the IME was to obtain an expert opinion on the 13 nature and extent of Plaintiff’s damages, as well as causation (i.e., an opinion on whether some or 14 all of Plaintiff’s alleged emotional distress damages were caused by Defendant, or by other 15 factors unrelated to Defendant); 16 17 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s prior counsel agreed that an IME was reasonable given Plaintiff’s allegations; 18 WHEREAS, on or about March 5, 2015, Plaintiff’s prior counsel notified defense counsel 19 that Plaintiff had agreed to the IME, and represented that Defendant would not be required to file 20 a noticed motion to compel the IME; 21 WHEREAS, the Parties entered a Stipulation Re: Plaintiff’s Mental Examination [FRCP 22 35] on March 11, 2015, by which Plaintiff agreed to submit to an examination by Charles Scott, 23 M.D. on April 21, 2015; 24 25 WHEREAS, Plaintiff arrived late for her mental examination on April 21, 2015, and Dr. Scott was unable to complete Plaintiff’s mental examination given her mental state; 26 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s prior counsel was granted leave to withdraw from representing 27 Plaintiff on or about September 2, 2015; 28 /// 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COMPLETION OF PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION AND INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS, the Court stayed all activity in the case from September 2, 2015 until October 31, 2015 to allow Plaintiff time to engage new counsel; WHEREAS, once the stay was lifted, Defendant attempted to meet and confer with Plaintiff directly regarding completion of her IME; 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff obtained new representation on or about December 4, 2015; 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not completed her IME to date; 7 WHEREAS, Dr. Scott’s next availability for an IME is March 2, 2016, and, if the IME is 8 not completed on that date, the IME will have to be continued several months thereafter given 9 Dr. Scott’s extremely busy schedule; 10 11 12 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s new counsel has assured defense counsel that Plaintiff understands she must complete her IME and will do so on March 2, 2016; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO, 13 THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL ATTEND 14 AND COMPLETE HER INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION WITH 15 DR. SCOTT ON MARCH 2, 2016. THE PARTIES FURTHER AGREE THAT THIS 16 STIPULATION SHALL BE IN EFFECT WHETHER OR NOT THE COURT SIGNS THE 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER BELOW. GAVRILOV & BROOKS 18 19 Dated: February 3, 2016 By /s/ J. Edward Brooks (as authorized on 2/2/16) J. Edward Brooks Cecilia L. Martin 20 21 Attorneys for Plaintiff GLORIA VALERIO 22 23 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 24 25 By /s/ Carolyn G. Burnette Carolyn G. Burnette Douglas M. Egbert Dated: February 3, 2016 26 Attorneys for Defendant COMPASS BANK 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COMPLETION OF PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION AND INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION 1 2 3 4 ORDER Based upon the foregoing stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Gloria Valerio shall complete her deposition in this matter by April 1, 5 6 2016; 2. Plaintiff Gloria Valerio shall attend and complete her independent medical 7 8 examination with Dr. Scott on March 2, 2016; 3. Any violation of the Parties’ Stipulation and/or this Order shall subject the 9 offending party to appropriate sanctions, as determined by the Court. 10 11 Dated: 2/3/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez___________________ HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT 12 13 14 4817-8624-6956, v. 2 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COMPLETION OF PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION AND INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?