Valerio v. Compass Bank

Filing 49

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/31/2016 ORDERING Plaintiff Gloria Valerio shall complete her deposition in this matter by 4/22/2016; any violation of the Parties' Stipulation and/or this Order shall subject theoffending party to appropriate sanctions, as determined by the Court. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 GAVRILOV & BROOKS J. EDWARD BROOKS (SBN 247767) CECILIA L. MARTIN (SBN 301027) 2315 Capitol Avenue Sacramento, California 95816 Telephone: (916) 504-0529 Facsimile: (916) 473-5870 Email: ebrooks@gavrilovelaw.com cmartin@gavrilovlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff GLORIA VALERIO 7 8 9 10 11 12 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. CAROLYN G. BURNETTE (SBN 191294) DOUGLAS M. EGBERT (SBN 265062) 801 K Street, Suite 2300 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 341-0404 Facsimile: (916) 341-0141 Email: burnettec@jacksonlewis.com egbertd@jacksonlewis.com 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant COMPASS BANK 15 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 19 Case 2:14-CV-00741-JAM-KJN GLORIA VALERIO, 20 21 22 23 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION Plaintiff, v. COMPASS BANK; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 24 Complaint Filed: Trial Date: 01/31/14 04/24/17 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 /// /// 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I. STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION GLORIA VALERIO (“Plaintiff”) and COMPASS BANK (“Defendant”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, the Parties requested by stipulation that the Court Order Plaintiff to complete her deposition by April 1, 2016 (“Stipulation”). WHEREAS, this Court signed the Stipulation on February 4, 2016, Ordering that Plaintiff complete her deposition by April 1, 2016 (“Order”). 8 WHEREAS, the Parties made a good faith effort to complete Plaintiff’s deposition by the 9 Ordered deadline (including by completing a substantial portion of the deposition testimony), but 10 have determined that they cannot do so because of: (1) various scheduling conflicts (including 11 with Plaintiff’s school schedule); and (2) the substantial amount of evidentiary materials that need 12 to be covered. 13 14 15 WHEREAS, the Parties wish to avoid a situation where they are not in compliance with the Order. THE PARTIES THEREFORE STIPULATE AND AGREE, THROUGH THEIR 16 RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL COMPLETE HER DEPOSITION 17 IN ITS ENTIRETY BY APRIL 22, 2016. THE PARTIES FURTHER 18 AGREE THAT THEY WILL MEET AND CONFER IN GOOD FAITH TO IDENTIFY 19 ADDITIONAL TIMES/DATES THAT: (1) ARE ON OR BEFORE APRIL 22, 2016; 20 (2) ARE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE; AND (3) TAKE INTO ACCOUNT PLAINTIFF’S 21 SCHOOL SCHEDULE. 22 Dated: March 30, 2016 GAVRILOV & BROOKS 23 24 25 26 27 By: /s/ Cecilia L. Martin (authorized on 3/30/16) J. Edward Brooks Cecilia L. Martin Attorneys for Plaintiff GLORIA VALERIO 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION 1 Dated: March 30, 2016 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 2 3 4 5 By: /s/ Carolyn G. Burnette Carolyn G. Burnette Douglas M. Egbert Attorneys for Defendant COMPASS BANK 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION 1 2 3 4 ORDER Based upon the foregoing stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Gloria Valerio shall complete her deposition in this matter by 5 6 April 22, 2016; 2. Any violation of the Parties’ Stipulation and/or this Order shall subject the 7 offending party to appropriate sanctions, as determined by the Court. 8 9 Dated: 3/31/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 4826-7288-7599, v. 1 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?