(PC) McColm v. Trinity County, et al.

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/28/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration #25 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICIA A. McCOLM, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0773 KJM CKD P v. ORDER TRINITY COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has requested that this court reconsider its February 9, 2015 order 20 dismissing this action and closing the case. (ECF No. 25.) 21 This action was dismissed on February 9, 2015, due to plaintiff’s failure to file an 22 amended complaint. (See ECF Nos. 21, 23.) Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to 23 amend by order filed May 29, 2014. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff received extensions of time, to and 24 including December 23, 2014, to file an amended complaint. (See ECF Nos. 14, 18.) She did not 25 file an amended complaint by that deadline and her request for reconsideration is not 26 accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. 27 ///// 28 1 1 A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) 2 or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th 3 Cir. 1993). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly 4 discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or 5 (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Id. at 1263. The February 9, 2015 6 decision dismissing this action was not clearly erroneous nor manifestly unjust, and none of the 7 other factors applies. 8 9 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 25) is denied. DATED: April 28, 2015. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?