(PC) McColm v. Trinity County, et al.
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/28/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration #25 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PATRICIA A. McCOLM,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0773 KJM CKD P
v.
ORDER
TRINITY COUNTY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42
19
U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has requested that this court reconsider its February 9, 2015 order
20
dismissing this action and closing the case. (ECF No. 25.)
21
This action was dismissed on February 9, 2015, due to plaintiff’s failure to file an
22
amended complaint. (See ECF Nos. 21, 23.) Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to
23
amend by order filed May 29, 2014. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff received extensions of time, to and
24
including December 23, 2014, to file an amended complaint. (See ECF Nos. 14, 18.) She did not
25
file an amended complaint by that deadline and her request for reconsideration is not
26
accompanied by a proposed amended complaint.
27
/////
28
1
1
A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)
2
or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th
3
Cir. 1993). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly
4
discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or
5
(3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.” Id. at 1263. The February 9, 2015
6
decision dismissing this action was not clearly erroneous nor manifestly unjust, and none of the
7
other factors applies.
8
9
10
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for
reconsideration (ECF No. 25) is denied.
DATED: April 28, 2015.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?