Smith v. Aubuchon, et al.

Filing 112

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/8/2019 ADOPTING 107 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 103 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

WILLIAM GRANVILLE SMITH,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:14-CV-0775-KJM-DMC-P

v.

ORDER

B. AUBUCHON, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by

18

Eastern District of California local rules.
On June 12, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,

19
20

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections

21

within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been

22

filed.

23

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United

24

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

25

reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations

26

of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate]

27

court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

28

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The findings and recommendations filed June 12, 2019, are adopted in full;

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 103) is denied.

3
4
5

and

DATED: August 8, 2019.

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2