McBride et al v. Fannie Mae et al
Filing
17
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/26/18 GRANTING 16 Motion for Reconsideration to the extent the 08/11/16 14 Order is CORRECTED to reflect that no timely objections to the court's 10 05/26/16 F&Rs had been filed; the 10 05/26/16 F&Rs REMAIN ADOPTED in full and this matter remains closed. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANNY McBRIDE, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:15-CV-2263-JAM-CMK PS
v.
ORDER
FANNIE MAE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, brought this civil action. Pending before the
17
18
court is plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the court’s August 11, 2016, order and final
19
judgment. Plaintiffs claim that, while the August 11, 2016, order stated that no objections to the
20
Magistrate Judge’s May 26, 2016, findings and recommendations had been filed, they in fact filed
21
objections on June 22, 2016. Plaintiffs are correct. See Doc. 11 (plaintiffs’ objections to findings
22
and recommendations). Plaintiff’s objections, however, were untimely.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), the court may reconsider any order
23
24
based on clerical mistakes. Because the August 11, 2016, order incorrectly recited that no
25
objections had been filed, the court will grant relief under Rule 60(a) to reflect that no timely
26
objections had been filed.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration (Doc. 16) is granted to the extent the
3
August 11, 2016, order is corrected to reflect that no timely objections to the court’s May 26,
4
2016, findings and recommendations had been filed; and
5
2.
6
and this matter remains closed.
The May 26, 2016, findings and recommendations remain adopted in full
7
8
9
10
DATED: April 26, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?