McBride et al v. Fannie Mae et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/26/18 GRANTING 16 Motion for Reconsideration to the extent the 08/11/16 14 Order is CORRECTED to reflect that no timely objections to the court's 10 05/26/16 F&Rs had been filed; the 10 05/26/16 F&Rs REMAIN ADOPTED in full and this matter remains closed. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANNY McBRIDE, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. 2:15-CV-2263-JAM-CMK PS v. ORDER FANNIE MAE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, brought this civil action. Pending before the 17 18 court is plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the court’s August 11, 2016, order and final 19 judgment. Plaintiffs claim that, while the August 11, 2016, order stated that no objections to the 20 Magistrate Judge’s May 26, 2016, findings and recommendations had been filed, they in fact filed 21 objections on June 22, 2016. Plaintiffs are correct. See Doc. 11 (plaintiffs’ objections to findings 22 and recommendations). Plaintiff’s objections, however, were untimely. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), the court may reconsider any order 23 24 based on clerical mistakes. Because the August 11, 2016, order incorrectly recited that no 25 objections had been filed, the court will grant relief under Rule 60(a) to reflect that no timely 26 objections had been filed. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration (Doc. 16) is granted to the extent the 3 August 11, 2016, order is corrected to reflect that no timely objections to the court’s May 26, 4 2016, findings and recommendations had been filed; and 5 2. 6 and this matter remains closed. The May 26, 2016, findings and recommendations remain adopted in full 7 8 9 10 DATED: April 26, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?