Plane Exchange, Inc. v. Francois

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/6/14 ORDERING that the Order Consolidating Cases and Amended Scheduling Order dated 7/18/14 13 shall be amended to state that discovery shall be completed in this matter by 1/31/2015. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 GLENN W. PETERSON, ESQ. (SBN 126173) MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP Attorneys at Law 2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone No: (916) 780-8222 Fax No: (916) 780-8775 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant The Plane Exchange, Inc. And Defendant Craig Vincent 10 BOUTIN JONES INC. Michael E. Chase, SBN 214506 Bashar S. Ahmad, SBN 258619 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500 Sacramento, CA 95814-4603 Telephone: (916) 321-4444 Facsimile: (916) 441-7597 11 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant Paul Francois 8 9 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) THE PLANE EXCHANGE, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) PAUL FRANCOIS, a natural person ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) PAUL FRANCOIS, ) ) Counter-claimant, ) vs. ) ) THE PLANE EXCHANGE, INC., a California ) ) corporation ) ) Counter-defendant. ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-CV-00784-WBS-KJN [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY ____________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY 1 PAUL FRANCOIS, 2 3 4 Plaintiff, vs. CRAIG VINCENT 5 Defendant. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Based on the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Continue Discovery Completion Date, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the Order Consolidating Cases and Amended Scheduling Order dated July 18, 2014 (Doc. 13) shall be amended to state that discovery shall be completed in this matter by January 31, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 16, 2014 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?