Plane Exchange, Inc. v. Francois
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/6/14 ORDERING that the Order Consolidating Cases and Amended Scheduling Order dated 7/18/14 13 shall be amended to state that discovery shall be completed in this matter by 1/31/2015. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
GLENN W. PETERSON, ESQ. (SBN 126173)
MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
Attorneys at Law
2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone No: (916) 780-8222
Fax No: (916) 780-8775
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant The Plane Exchange, Inc.
And Defendant Craig Vincent
10
BOUTIN JONES INC.
Michael E. Chase, SBN 214506
Bashar S. Ahmad, SBN 258619
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500
Sacramento, CA 95814-4603
Telephone: (916) 321-4444
Facsimile: (916) 441-7597
11
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant Paul Francois
8
9
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
THE PLANE EXCHANGE, INC.
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
PAUL FRANCOIS, a natural person
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
PAUL FRANCOIS,
)
)
Counter-claimant,
)
vs.
)
)
THE PLANE EXCHANGE, INC., a California )
)
corporation
)
)
Counter-defendant.
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:14-CV-00784-WBS-KJN
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
DEADLINE TO COMPLETE
DISCOVERY
____________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY
1
PAUL FRANCOIS,
2
3
4
Plaintiff,
vs.
CRAIG VINCENT
5
Defendant.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Based on the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Continue Discovery Completion Date, and good cause
appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the Order Consolidating Cases and Amended Scheduling Order
dated July 18, 2014 (Doc. 13) shall be amended to state that discovery shall be completed in this
matter by January 31, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 16, 2014
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?