Plane Exchange, Inc. v. Francois
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER 21 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/23/2015: This case shall be stayed and all associated dates (both pretrial and trial dates) VACATED. The stay shall remain in effect for a period of 90 days. Should the ca se be resolved, the parties will notify the Court promptly by filing appropriate dispositional documents. Should the case not resolve, the parties shall file a joint status report on or before 4/30/2015, and advise the Court as to the status of the case. In the joint status report, the parties shall propose a date for a further joint status/scheduling conference. CASE STAYED. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
4
BOUTIN JONES INC.
Michael E. Chase, SBN 214506
Bashar S. Ahmad, SBN 258619
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500
Sacramento, CA 95814-4603
Telephone: (916) 321-4444
Facsimile: (916) 441-7597
5
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant Paul Francois
6
GLENN W. PETERSON, ESQ. (SBN 126173)
MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
Attorneys at Law
2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone No: (916) 780-8222
Fax No: (916) 780-8775
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant The Plane Exchange, Inc.
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
THE PLANE EXCHANGE, INC.
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
PAUL FRANCOIS, a natural person
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
PAUL FRANCOIS,
)
)
Counter-claimant,
)
vs.
)
)
THE PLANE EXCHANGE, INC., a California )
)
corporation
)
)
Counter-defendant.
)
)
)
Case No. 2:14-CV-00784-WBS-KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
____________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
1
2
PAUL FRANCOIS,
3
4
5
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
CRAIG VINCENT
6
Defendant.
7
8
9
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant The Plane Exchange, Inc. (“TPX”), and Defendant/Counter-
10
Claimant Paul Francois (“Francois”), the non-bankrupt parties in this consolidated action, by and
11
through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows and propose that the Court
12
enter an order consistent with its terms present.
RECITALS
13
14
WHEREAS, on Thursday, January 15, 2015, the undersigned counsel for TPX discovered
15
that Defendant Craig Vincent (“Vincent”) commenced a voluntary Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
16
proceeding on or about November 26, 2014. A notice of automatic stay was filed by TPX’s counsel
17
earlier today (Doc. 20).
18
WHEREAS, although Vincent’s petition was filed in November, neither TPX’s counsel nor
19
counsel for Francois was notified. Vincent’s Bankruptcy was discovered immediately prior to
20
commencement of Mr. Vincent’s deposition. So as to avoid any arguable violations of the automatic
21
stay, counsel mutually agreed to suspend Vincent’s examination, both individually and as a PMK on
22
behalf of TPX.
23
WHEREAS, since then, counsel have met and conferred over the impact of Vincent’s
24
bankruptcy on this case, and both sides agree that this action is undoubtedly stayed as to Vincent.
25
However, Francois is not prepared at this point to dismiss Vincent, at least without further
26
investigation into obtaining relief from stay, and related matters.
27
28
WHEREAS, Counsel also agree that this unexpected development materially alters the
settlement landscape of this case, and desire to reevaluate settlement scenarios in light of it.
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
NOW, THEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, TPX and Francois stipulate that it is in the
interests of all concerned and will promote judicial economy to stay this case in its entirety as set
forth below, or on such other terms as the Court may order:
1.
This case shall be stayed and all associated dates (both pretrial and trial dates) vacated.
The stay shall remain in effect for a period of 90 days.
2.
Within the 90-day stay period, TPX and Francois shall meet and confer in good faith to
explore settlement.
Counsel for Francois shall determine whether they will seek relief from
Vincent’s bankruptcy stay and file a motion to do so.
3.
Should the case be resolved, the parties will notify the Court promptly by filing
appropriate dispositional documents.
4.
Should the case not resolve, the parties shall file a joint status report on or before April
30, 2015, and advise the Court as to the status of the case. In the joint status report, the parties shall
propose a date for a further joint status/scheduling conference.
5.
The Court may enter an order upon this stipulation.
15
16
DATED: January 21, 2015
BOUTIN JONES INC.
17
By:
18
19
/s/BASHAR AHMAD
BASHAR AHMAD
(AUTHORIZED ON JANUARY 21, 2015)
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant Paul
Francois
20
21
22
DATED: January 21, 2015
23
MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
Attorneys at Law
24
By:
25
26
27
28
/s/GLENN W. PETERSON
GLENN W. PETERSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant The Plane
Exchange, Inc.
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/)
within this e-filed document.
MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP, Attorneys at Law
/s/ Glenn W. Peterson
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
1
ORDER
2
3
4
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: January 23, 2015
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?