Grigsby v. Munguia, et al.

Filing 108

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/23/17 ordering ( Settlement Conference set for 5/25/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.) Each party shall provide a confidential settlement statement to the following emailaddress: saborders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlementstatement to Sujean Park, ADR & Pro Bono Program Director, USDC CAED, 501 IStreet, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814. The envelope shall be markedConfidential Settlement Statement. Settlement statements shall arrive no later thanMay 18, 2017. Parties shall also file a Notice of Submission of ConfidentialSettlement Conference Statement (See Local Rule 270(d)). (cc: ADR and SAB). (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN GRIGSBY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0789 GEB AC P v. ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE M. MUNGUIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 18 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 20, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion 19 requesting a settlement conference. ECF No. 99. Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition 20 on March 8, 2017. ECF No. 105. The court has determined that this case will benefit from a 21 settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone 22 to conduct a settlement conference at the U. S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, 23 California 93721 in Courtroom #9 on May 25, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone 26 on May 25, 2017 at11:00 a.m. at the U. S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, 27 California 93721 in Courtroom #9. 28 //// 1 1 2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person.1 2 3 3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. 4 The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in 5 person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not 6 proceed and will be reset to another date. 7 4. Each party shall provide a confidential settlement statement to the following email 8 address: saborders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement 9 statement to Sujean Park, ADR & Pro Bono Program Director, USDC CAED, 501 I 10 Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814. The envelope shall be marked 11 “Confidential Settlement Statement.” Settlement statements shall arrive no later than 12 May 18, 2017. Parties shall also file a Notice of Submission of Confidential 13 Settlement Conference Statement (See Local Rule 270(d)). 14 15 Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on 16 any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked Aconfidential@ with 17 the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement conferences.” United States v. United States Dist. Court for the N. Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012) (“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 486 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001). 2 1 The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length, 2 typed or neatly printed, and include the following: 3 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 4 b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds 5 upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties= 6 likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the 7 major issues in dispute. 8 c. A summary of the proceedings to date. 9 d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, 10 and trial. 11 e. The relief sought. 12 f. The party=s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a 13 14 15 16 history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands. g. A brief statement of each party=s expectations and goals for the settlement conference. DATED: March 23, 2017 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?