Grigsby v. Munguia, et al.

Filing 72

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/14/2016 ORDERING 68 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED in PART; within 21 days after the filing date of this order, defendants shall submit the excessive force report to the magistrate judge for in camera review; and file and serve their objections to disclosing the report to plaintiff; Plaintiff may file and serve a reply within 14 days after service of defendants' objections. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JONATHAN GRIGSBY, 11 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0789 GEB AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. MUNGUIA, et al., Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 9, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings 18 and recommendations and an order that granted, in pertinent part, plaintiff’s motion to compel 19 production of CDCR’s excessive force report related to the incident that forms the basis of 20 plaintiff’s complaint. ECF No. 66. On March 25, 2016, defendants filed a motion for 21 reconsideration of this portion of the March 9, 2016 order. ECF No. 68. Defendants request that 22 the district judge reject the ruling or, in the alternative, that defendants be granted the opportunity 23 to file objections. Id. at 2. 24 Pursuant to Local Rule 303, a district judge may reconsider any matter determined in an 25 action by the assigned magistrate judge. Local Rule 303(g). An order of the magistrate judge 26 shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Local Rule 303(f). While this 27 court finds that the magistrate judge’s ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, it 28 does appear that further briefing and an opportunity to review the subject report in camera would 1 1 be helpful in addressing the concerns of all parties. 2 Accordingly, defendants’ motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 68) is GRANTED IN 3 PART. Within twenty-one (21) days after the filing date of this order, defendants shall: (1) 4 submit the excessive force report to the magistrate judge for in camera review, and (2) file and 5 serve their objections to disclosing the report to plaintiff. Plaintiff may file and serve a reply 6 within fourteen (14) days after service of defendants’ objections. Upon review of the subject 7 report and the parties’ further briefing, the magistrate judge should decide whether a new order 8 issues addressing de novo plaintiff’s motion to compel production of the report. In all other 9 respects, defendants’ motion for reconsideration is denied. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2016 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?