Grigsby v. Munguia, et al.
Filing
72
ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/14/2016 ORDERING 68 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED in PART; within 21 days after the filing date of this order, defendants shall submit the excessive force report to the magistrate judge for in camera review; and file and serve their objections to disclosing the report to plaintiff; Plaintiff may file and serve a reply within 14 days after service of defendants' objections. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JONATHAN GRIGSBY,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0789 GEB AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
M. MUNGUIA, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed
17
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 9, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings
18
and recommendations and an order that granted, in pertinent part, plaintiff’s motion to compel
19
production of CDCR’s excessive force report related to the incident that forms the basis of
20
plaintiff’s complaint. ECF No. 66. On March 25, 2016, defendants filed a motion for
21
reconsideration of this portion of the March 9, 2016 order. ECF No. 68. Defendants request that
22
the district judge reject the ruling or, in the alternative, that defendants be granted the opportunity
23
to file objections. Id. at 2.
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 303, a district judge may reconsider any matter determined in an
25
action by the assigned magistrate judge. Local Rule 303(g). An order of the magistrate judge
26
shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Local Rule 303(f). While this
27
court finds that the magistrate judge’s ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, it
28
does appear that further briefing and an opportunity to review the subject report in camera would
1
1
be helpful in addressing the concerns of all parties.
2
Accordingly, defendants’ motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 68) is GRANTED IN
3
PART. Within twenty-one (21) days after the filing date of this order, defendants shall: (1)
4
submit the excessive force report to the magistrate judge for in camera review, and (2) file and
5
serve their objections to disclosing the report to plaintiff. Plaintiff may file and serve a reply
6
within fourteen (14) days after service of defendants’ objections. Upon review of the subject
7
report and the parties’ further briefing, the magistrate judge should decide whether a new order
8
issues addressing de novo plaintiff’s motion to compel production of the report. In all other
9
respects, defendants’ motion for reconsideration is denied.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 14, 2016
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?