Johnson v. Elk Horn Gas, Inc.
Filing
88
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/4/19 GRANTING Plaintiff's 87 Motion to Continue. Debtor's Examination Hearing is CONTINUED from 12/6/19 to 3/13/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT JOHNSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0798 MCE DB
v.
ORDER
ELK HORN GAS INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(11), a judgment debtor examination is scheduled before the
18
undersigned on December 6, 2019. (ECF No. 86.) On December 3, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion
19
to continue the judgment debtor examination to March 6, 2020, to allow plaintiff to effect service
20
on the judgment debtor. (ECF No. 87.) Plaintiff’s request will be granted. However, March 6,
21
2020, is not an available date. The judgment debtor examination, therefore, will be continued to
22
March 13, 2020.
23
Moreover, this is the fifth time the judgment debtor examination has been continued. The
24
undersigned first signed an order setting a judgment debtor examination in this action on June 29,
25
2018. (ECF No. 62.) Any further request for a continuation of the March 13, 2020 judgment
26
debtor examination shall detail plaintiff’s efforts in effecting service on the judgment debtor, as
27
well as why plaintiff believes additional time will result in service on the judgment debtor.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s December 3, 2019 motion to continue (ECF No. 87) is granted; and
3
2. The December 6, 2019 judgment debtor examination is continued to Friday, March
4
13, 2020, at 9:30 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in
5
Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned.
6
DATED: December 4, 2019
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?