Kaur v. Gordon

Filing 11

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/23/2014 adopting 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; REMANDING CASE to Sacramento County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Waggoner, D)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TIRATH KAUR,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-0812 TLN AC PS

v.

ORDER

DESMOND GORDON,

15

Defendant.

16
Defendant, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action on April 1, 2014. The

17
18

matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).
On May 1, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

19
20

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

21

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days.1 Neither party has filed

22

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

23
24

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

25

///

26

1

27
28

Due to an oversight in the Clerk’s office, defendant was not served with these findings and
recommendations at the time of their filing. See ECF No. 10. On May 20, 2014, however,
service was accomplished. Defendant, thus, had 14 days from the date of service to file
objections.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 1, 2014, are adopted in full; and

3

2. This action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court for lack of subject

4

matter jurisdiction.

5

Dated: June 23, 2014

6
7
8
9

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

10
11
12

/kaur0812.801

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2