Johnson v. Relves, et al.
Filing
104
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/5/2014. It is ORDERED that Clerk assign District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Court is also RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pro cedure 41(b). These Findings and Recommendations are SUBMITTED to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KURT JOHNSON,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0824 CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER and FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
JEYSEN RELVES, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
On May 27, 2014, defendants filed a motion to dismiss and for summary judgment. On
18
June 24, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the
19
pending motion within thirty days. In the same order, plaintiff was informed that failure to file an
20
opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R.
21
Civ. P. 41(b). The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the
22
court’s order.
23
24
25
26
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the court
assign a district court judge to this case; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 41(b).
27
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
28
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
1
1
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
2
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
3
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
4
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
5
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
6
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
7
Dated: August 5, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
1
John0824.46fr
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?