Kaur et al v. City of Lodi et al
Filing
162
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/13/16 granting 152 APPLICATION. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
MAYALL HURLEY, P.C.
A Professional Corporation
2453 Grand Canal Boulevard, Second Floor
Stockton, California 95207-8253
Telephone (209) 477-3833
MARK E. BERRY, ESQ.
CA State Bar No. 155091
DERICK KONZ, ESQ
CA State Bar No. 286902
Attorneys for Defendants,
SCOTT BRATTON and ADAM LOCKIE.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SUKHWINDER KAUR, et al.,
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF LODI, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:14-CV-00828-TLN-AC
DEFENDANTS SCOTT BRATTON AND
ADAM LOCKIE’S APPLICATION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT EXCEEDS
TWENTY (20) PAGES and ORDER
Having considered Defendants SCOTT BRATTON and ADAM LOCKIE’s application for leave
to file an initial brief in support of their motion for summary judgment that exceeds the twenty (20) page
limitation (ECF No. 152), the application is hereby GRANTED, good cause appearing therefor.
The page limitation for the initial brief in support of Defendants SCOTT BRATTON and ADAM
LOCKIE’s motion for summary judgment in the above-entitled action is hereby set at thirty-five (35)
pages. A thirty-five (35) page limit shall also be imposed on Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion and a
twenty (20) page limit imposed on defendants’ reply brief in support of the motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 13, 2016
27
28
29
30
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Order on Defendants Scott Bratton And Adam Lockie’s Application For Leave To File A Motion For Summary Judgment That Exceeds Twenty (20) Pages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?