Maximus, Inc. v. Nimbus Data Systems, Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/26/16: The Court orders this action be dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety, as to both parties. Each party to this action shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Jeremy Meier (SBN 139849)
Anthony J. Cortez (SBN 251743)
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
1201 K Street, Suite 1100
Sacramento, CA 95814-3938
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
And Counter Defendant
MAXIMUS, Inc.
William J. Frimel (SBN 160287)
SEUBERT FRENCH FRIMEL & WARNER LLP
1075 Curtis Street
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: [phone]

11
12
13
14
15

Margaret A. Crawford (SBN 238205)
LAW OFFICES OF MARGARET A. CRAWFORD
626 Pico Ave.
San Mateo, CA 94403
Tel: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter Complainant
NIMBUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
NIMBUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware )
corporation, and DOES 1 - 50,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.
)
)
MAXIMUS, INC., a Virginia corporation,

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.
RULE 41(a)(1) AND 41(c); ORDER

Case No. Case No. 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(1) AND 41(c);
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

WHEREAS Plaintiff And Counter Defendant MAXIMUS, INC. and Defendant and Counter

2

Complainant NIMBUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC. agree that all claims in the above-captioned proceeding

3

have been fully settled and compromised;

4

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their

5

undersigned counsel, that the entire above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as

6

to Plaintiff and Counter Defendant MAXIMUS, INC. pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and as to

7

Defendant and Counter Complainant NIMBUS DATA SYTEMS, INC. pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(c);

8
9

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties that each party shall bear its own
attorneys’ fee and costs of suit.

10
11

DATED: January 26, 2016

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

12
By:

13
14
15
16

DATED: January 26, 2016

//s// Jeremy A. Meier
Jeremy A. Meier
Anthony J. Cortez
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant
MAXIMUS, Inc.
SEUBERT FRENCH FRIMEL AND WARNER

17
18
19
20

By:

//s// William J. Frimel
WILLIAM J. FRIMEL
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter Complainant
NIMBUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. Case No. 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(1) AND 41(c);
[PROPOSED] ORDER

ORDER

1
2

In view of the parties’ Stipulation, the Court orders the above-captioned action be dismissed with

3

prejudice, in its entirety, as to both parties. Each party to this action shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and

4

costs of suit.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 1/26/2016
/s/ John A. Mendez_____________
John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
Eastern District of California

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. Case No. 2:14-cv-00841-JAM-KJN
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(1) AND 41(c);
[PROPOSED] ORDER