Nash v. Wachovia Bank et al
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/6/2016 DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to issue all process pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 4 and to send the plaintiff one USM-285 form, one copy of the 7 Summons, a copy of the 5 First Amended Com plaint, and the 8 Civil New Case Documents; ADVISING the plaintiff that the U.S. Marshal will require: one completed summons, one completed USM-285 form for each defendant, a copy of the first amended complaint for each defendant, with an extra cop y for the U.S. Marshal, and a copy of the civil new case documents for each defendant; ORDERING the plaintiff to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 14 days, all the information needed to effectuate service and to file a statement with the court that sai d documents have been submitted; DIRECTING the U.S. Marshal to serve all process without prepayment of costs within 90 days of receipt of the required information from the plaintiff; CAUTIONING the plaintiff that a failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (cc: U.S. Marshal) (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MAURICE R. NASH,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 2:14-cv-850-MCE-EFB PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WACHOVIA BANK, WELL’S FARGO
BANK, EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SYSTEM LLC., and DOES 1-20,
inclusive,
Defendants.
18
19
This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona and in forma pauperis,
20
proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint. ECF No. 5. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2),
21
the court is directed to dismiss a case filed pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute if, at any
22
time, it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or
23
malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against
24
an immune defendant. The court cannot make this determination on the present record.
25
Therefore, the court reserves decision on these issues until the record is sufficiently developed.
26
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
27
1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith all process pursuant to Federal
28
Rule of Civil Procedure 4.
1
1
2. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, a copy of
2
the complaint, this court’s scheduling order, and the forms providing notice of the magistrate
3
judge’s availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes.
4
3. Plaintiff is advised that the U.S. Marshal will require:
5
a. One completed summons;
6
b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant;
7
c. A copy of the complaint for each defendant, with an extra copy for the U.S.
8
Marshal; and,
9
10
11
d. A copy of this court’s scheduling order and related documents for each
defendant.
4. Plaintiff shall supply the United States Marshal, within 14 days from the date this order
12
is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall, within 14
13
days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the
14
United States Marshal.
15
5. The U.S. Marshal shall serve process, with copies of this court’s scheduling order and
16
related documents, within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiff, without
17
prepayment of costs. The United States Marshal shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement
18
with the court that said documents have been served. If the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any
19
reason, to effect service of process on any defendant, the Marshal shall promptly report that fact,
20
and the reasons for it, to the undersigned.
21
22
23
6. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal, 501
“I” Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 (tel. 916-930-2030).
7. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be
24
dismissed.
25
DATED: January 6, 2016.
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?