Ellis v. Abdur-Rahman et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/5/15 ORDERING that Defendants motion to modify the courts discovery and scheduling order (Doc. No. 19 ) is granted; Defendant shall file a dispositive motion in this case on or before November 2, 2015. No further extensions of time will be granted for this purpose; and except as otherwise stated in this order, the courts discovery and scheduling order remains in effect.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 ROBERT ELLIS, 13 14 v. 15 16 2:14-cv-00852-DAD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SECOND REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE DR. ABDUR-RAHMAN, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 Defendant Abdur-Rahman has filed a second motion to modify the discovery and 20 scheduling order in this case to extend the deadline to file a dispositive motion to November 2, 21 2015. Good cause appearing, the court will grant defendant’s request. However, no further 22 extensions of time will be granted for this purpose. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Defendant’s motion to modify the court’s discovery and scheduling order (Doc. No. 19) 25 is granted; 2. Defendant shall file a dispositive motion in this case on or before November 2, 2015. 26 27 No further extensions of time will be granted for this purpose; and 28 ///// 1 3. Except as otherwise stated in this order, the court’s discovery and scheduling order 2 remains in effect. 3 Dated: October 5, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /elli0852.41mod

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?