Rushdan v. Win et al

Filing 57

ORDER denying 53 Motion for service and/or summary judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/30/15. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SALADIN RUSHDAN, 12 No. 2:14-cv-0853 KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 DR. WIN, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s April 6, 2015 motion for “service of 19 summons and complaint and/or summary judgment against defendant Warden G. Swarthout.” 20 (ECF No. 53.) Plaintiff moves the court for service of defendant Swarthout. If defendant 21 Swarthout has been served, plaintiff moves for summary judgment as to this defendant. On December 4, 2014, the court directed the U.S. Marshal to serve defendants, including 22 23 defendant Swarthout. (ECF No. 42.) On April 13, 2015, defendants Arnold, Austin, Beard, 24 Fleischman, McAlpine, Wang and Win filed an answer. (ECF No. 55.) Court records indicate that service on defendant Swarthout has not yet been executed. 25 26 The U.S. Marshal has informed the court that it is still attempting to serve defendant Swarthout. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for service and/or 2 summary judgment as to defendant Swarthout (ECF No. 53) is denied as unnecessary. 3 Dated: April 30, 2015 4 5 6 7 Rush853.sj 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?