Elder v. Swarthout
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/17/2017 ORDERING plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff is warned that failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with the 3/7/2017 order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
COREY JEROME ELDER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:14-cv-0892 WBS DB P
ORDER
GARY SWARTHOUT,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights
17
18
action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff challenges a prison disciplinary proceeding that resulted
19
in a loss of 180 days good time credits. Upon screening, the court found plaintiff failed to state a
20
potentially cognizable claim and gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (Mar. 7,
21
2017 Order (ECF No. 15).) Thirty days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended
22
complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s March 7 order. Plaintiff will be given one more
23
opportunity to amend his complaint.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint
25
within thirty days of service of this order. Plaintiff is warned that his failure to file an amended
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
complaint in accordance with the March 7 order will result in a recommendation that this case be
2
dismissed. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41.
3
DATED: April 17, 2017
4
5
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/elde0892.fta or
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?