Elder v. Swarthout

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/17/2017 ORDERING plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff is warned that failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with the 3/7/2017 order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COREY JEROME ELDER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:14-cv-0892 WBS DB P ORDER GARY SWARTHOUT, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 17 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff challenges a prison disciplinary proceeding that resulted 19 in a loss of 180 days good time credits. Upon screening, the court found plaintiff failed to state a 20 potentially cognizable claim and gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (Mar. 7, 21 2017 Order (ECF No. 15).) Thirty days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended 22 complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s March 7 order. Plaintiff will be given one more 23 opportunity to amend his complaint. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint 25 within thirty days of service of this order. Plaintiff is warned that his failure to file an amended 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 complaint in accordance with the March 7 order will result in a recommendation that this case be 2 dismissed. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 3 DATED: April 17, 2017 4 5 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DLB:9 DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/elde0892.fta or 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?