Cooke, et al v. City of Stockton, et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/18/16 ORDERING that the Settlement Conference is RESET for 1/18/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., SBN 69888 BEN NISENBAUM, Esq., SBN 222173 JAMES A. COOK, ESQ., SBN 300212 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Center 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 James.cook@johnburrislaw.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 BREANNA COOKE, individually and as Co- ) ) Successor-in-Interest for Decedent JAMES ) COOKE; et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) JEREMY EDENS, in his individual and ) official capacity as Police Officer for the City ) of Stockton; et al. ) ) ) Defendants. _____________________________________ ) Case No.: 2:14-cv-00908-KJM-KJN STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs Breanna Cooke, et al., 20 21 (“Plaintiffs”) and Jeremy Edens, et al., (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of 22 record, that GOOD CAUSE exists and the parties respectfully request that the Court 23 continue the Settlement Conference, in the above-entitled action presently set for 24 Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. to a new date of Wednesday, January 18, 2017 25 at 9:30 a.m. 26 During the pendency of this case, counsels for the parties have worked diligently to 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 2:14-cv-00908-KJM-KJN 1 prepare their cases in accordance with the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order issued on July 2 22, 2015. Despite the parties’ best efforts, the parties still have to work through 3 preliminary written discovery Responses and scheduling depositions of the 4 witnesses in this case. Furthermore, evaluating the case and the themes of the 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 litigation cannot adequately be completed without the information from these key depositions. As such, the parties cannot conduct a meaningful Settlement Conference until preliminary written discovery Responses and depositions have been completed. Based on the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that this Court continue the Settlement Conference to a new date of Wednesday, January 28, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. 13 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 Dated: August 17, 2016 16 17 /s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum Benjamin Nisenbaum, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Attorney for Plaintiffs BREANNA COOKE, et al. 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: August 17, 2016 /s/ Bryan Rome (as authorized on August 17, 2016) Bryan Rome, Esq. Deputy City Attorney CITY OF STOCKTON Attorney for Defendants JEREMY EDENS, et al. 23 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 24 25 26 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (“/s/”) within this E-filed document or been authorized by all counsel to show his or her signature on this Stipulation as /s/. 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 2:14-cv-00908-KJM-KJN ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Settlement Conference is hereby continued from Wednesday, August 24, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., to a new date of Wednesday, January 18, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: August 18, 2016 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 2:14-cv-00908-KJM-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?